[Dx-qsl] LBOTW

Fri, 8 Mar 2002 08:08:06 -0500

Who needs Romeo, anyway?  eQSL got me P5SLIM instead! <g>

73

----- Original Message ----- 
From: FireBrick <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 6:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Dx-qsl] LBOTW

I'm fully aware of LBOTW strict requirements.

I was making a tongue in cheek joke.
And the joke is on my as I have those qsl's in my Worked All Pirates file.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nenad Stevanovic" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 1:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Dx-qsl] LBOTW

> FireBrick wrote:
> > 
> > Been reading all the comments on eQSL and Logbook of the World.
> > LBOTW will be a step forward.
> > eQSL...ok for those that like it.
> > 
> > But had a thought. (My one for the year).
> > 
> > Wouldn't it be funny if Romeo posted his P5RS7 log onto eQSL and LBOTW?
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > You need a Lifestyle change if: You took a fishing pole to Sea World.
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > Bill H. in Chicagoland
> > [email protected]
> > 
> > Please help QSL.NET . Send your donation now.
> 
> 
> Bill,
> 
> 
> 
> That is the main difference between eQSl, and LoTW.
> 
> 
> In eQSl anyone can get the password and submit his logs.
> 
> In LoTW, the potential user has to go through rigorous authentication
> process to get the access. If they recognize the operator, they simply
> may not give him aceess privildge and he cannot submit the log.
> 
> More details are in LoTW design document.
> 
> 
> 
> regards
> 
> 
> 
> Nenad  VE3EXY   ...
> ###
> Please help QSL.NET . Send your donation now.
> 
> 

Please help QSL.NET . Send your donation now.