[Dx-qsl] Multiple QSOs

Steven Wheatley KU9C [email protected]
Sat, 23 Feb 2002 14:20:35 -0500


Steve, I was referring to DXpeditions, not DX stations.  I find that DXpeditions want a samplingn of cards at best, in general...and certainly the 100'th 20 ssb QSL from NJ isn't worth much.  DX, on the other hand, I agree...but you're less likely to have 10 Q's with a DX station in a week.

73

--------------------------- 
Steve Wheatley KU9C 
PO Box 5953 
Parsippany NJ  07054-6953 
U.S.A. 

email:  [email protected] 
http://www.ku9c.com/



---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Steve Litwins" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:01:08 -0600

>Steve;
>That (not including your card) is probably not a good idea.  I think that
>shud be left to the dx to toss the card or the mgr.  What is he collects
>stuff like prefixes, counties, grids whatever and wants to go thru all the
>cards later.  That is why I was printing multiple Qs (most are now-a-days)
>on paper and attaching the paper print-out to the back of the card.  Note
>that this usually works.  Writing the extra Qs on the back (my printing is
>pretty good) sometimes does not work.  Note also that this phenonomom has
>just started to happen to me.  73/dx
>steve, k8wk
>*************
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Steven Wheatley KU9C <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected]
><[email protected]>
>Date: Saturday, February 23, 2002 12:34 PM
>Subject: Re: [Dx-qsl] Multiple QSOs
>
>
>>
>>what also works, as Bill correctly notes most dxpeditons toss the card...is
>use your printer, and print out the QSOs ....probably in date/time
>sorting....and send that to the manager....with your call on it...and the
>sase, etc.
>>
>>Having ALL the Qs in ONE place, without multiple cards, flipping things
>here and there, etc...is BY FAR the best for me, and most managers, I
>suspect
>>
>>
>>---------------------------
>>Steve Wheatley KU9C
>>PO Box 5953
>>Parsippany NJ  07054-6953
>>U.S.A.
>>
>>email:  [email protected]
>>http://www.ku9c.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
>>From: "FireBrick" <[email protected]>
>>Reply-To: [email protected]
>>Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 09:13:19 -0600
>>
>>>DXBase even has a 6 qso label for qsling.
>>>I found out the hard way that labels on the back even with postit notes
>get
>>>overlooked.
>>>
>>>Better to send more cards. And actually as most of these dxpeditions don't
>>>really care about saving USA cards....put all the labels on the front even
>>>if it covers up everything but your call.
>>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: <[email protected]>
>>>To: "DX-QSL" <[email protected]>
>>>Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 7:56 AM
>>>Subject: [Dx-qsl] Multiple QSOs
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> T2T came back to me not in the log. These things sometimes happen and I
>>>> had rather managers not answer for contacts that are not logged. What I
>>>> don't understand  is I had 3 more band contacts on the back of the card
>>>> and none of them were replied to. I put a 'post it' note on the front
>>>> about the other contacts. I find it hard to believe that none of 4
>>>> contacts made it in the log, which leads me to believe that the contacts
>>>> on the back of the card were overlooked. I have emailed JN1HOW and I am
>>>> waiting for his reply. In the meantime, I have a question for the list.
>>>> Have others experienced the same problem by putting multiple QSOs on one
>>>> card by placing them on the back?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 73,
>>>> Hal K4HB
>>>> http://www.k4hb.com
>>>>
>>>>      (\____/)
>>>>      /   _   \
>>>>     (   (oo)  )
>>>>      \-..~~.-/
>>>>       DX Pig
>>>>     Oink Oink
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please help QSL.NET . Send your donation now.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>Please help QSL.NET . Send your donation now.
>>>
>>Please help QSL.NET . Send your donation now.
>>
>
>
>Please help QSL.NET . Send your donation now.
>