[Dx-qsl] IRC question

[Carl Smidt]

It really should be obvious to any Postal Clerk in any country, or anyone
else for that matter, that an IRC is like money or a postage stamp [or
Canadian Tire money :>) ]. It has actual monetary value and it would be
unthinkable and certainly unethical for any country NOT to accept an IRC at
face value indefinitely, much like an old stamp or old paper currency.

73,   Carl   VE9OV
----- Original Message -----
From: "Arthur Nelson" <wb9hnj@altavista.com>
To: <dx-qsl@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Dx-qsl] IRC question


> On Sat, 16 February 2002, "Steven Wheatley KU9C" wrote:
>
> >
> > Just wrote an extensive article on this in DX Magazine, but boiling it
down, the IRC should be
>
> Thanks for the info Steve...that helps a lot i was curious since i got a
card back from a gentleman in Wales that said that the irc had expired and
it was one of the surplus irc's that i sent...i guess its truly up to the
individual postal system if its good or not.
>
>
> Find the best deals on the web at AltaVista Shopping!
> http://www.shopping.altavista.com
> Please help QSL.NET . Send your donation now.
>