[Dx-qsl] eQSL policy changed

Sat Apr 6 15:14:01 2002

Please start another list with the subject e-qsl and put all your 
comments on this subject on that list.
This way people who are not interested in this matter are avoid of 
all the emails......

Op 6 Apr 2002 om 13:46, Ron Notarius WN3VAW schreef:

> Vince:
> 
> I never said the email wasn't authentic.  Therefore your entire discussion
> is based on a false premise.
> 
> Since you have obviously decided to determine what I can and can not comment
> on, there is no point to further discussion.
> 
> 73, ron wn3vaw
> 
> "Why, he's no fun, he fell right over."
> 
> -- The Firesign Theatre
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Vince <[email protected]>
> To: Ron Notarius WN3VAW <[email protected]>
> Cc: DX QSL <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 1:08 PM
> Subject: Re: [Dx-qsl] eQSL policy changed
> 
> 
> 
> After reading all of your grief, I do not see any evidence presented that
> would
> indicate that the quoted email is not authentic.   This does not surprise me
> in
> the least bit.  Everything else that you have written just circumvents the
> issue
> that I have raised.  I  challenged you to present evidence that what is
> quoted
> is not authentic eMail from Bill Moore.  What part of "bring on the evidence
> Ron" do you not understand?
> 
> 
>          To which eMail from Wayne Mills do you refer?  I made no mention of
> an
>     eMail from Wayne in my posting which was a reply to the concerns of Gary
>   Smith.   Oh, you must be referring to my posting in which I gave the URL
> for
>  Wayne's statement. I gave that URL info for your benefit Ron, just because
> you
>                          might not have known about it.
> 
>        I clipped 3/4 of your post because I did not want to address that
> portion
> and thereby prolong your grief.  See Ron, I prefer to keep things in context
> and
>  avoid making any non relevant comments in  my reply .  Yes, let us not
> confuse
>         the issues at hand by introducing new grief-stricken statements.
> 
>             No one asked for your (1) interpretation of Bill's eMail. Read
> the
>  entire eMail from Bill Moore, and there should be little doubt that
> permission
>                        was given to discuss the content.
> 
>          I doubt that there is any truth in your (4), because I am aware of
> what
> has already been discussed by the Advisory Board members.  If you are upset
> that
>              eQSL.cc did not give you notice, that is truly a shame.
> 
>           OKay, I will clip all of your comments, to allow you to feel
> better,
>  lessen the bandwidth used, and not force others to read it again. You know
> what
>   you wrote in (1) and (4), so you will have no problem comprehending, or
> will
>                                       you?
> 
> Ron Notarius WN3VAW wrote:
> 
> >             NIL
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please help QSL.NET . Send your donation now. 
> 
> If you have already donated, thanks !

Met vriendelijke groeten,

[email protected]
Best 73's
Jan PA9JJ
[email protected]
______________________________________________________
___

If you ever need a QSL-manager please think of me!
Take a look at my homepage on http://www.qsl.net/pa9jj
and sign the guestbook please.