[Dx-qsl] eQSL policy changed

[Vince]

After reading all of your grief, I do not see any evidence presented that would
indicate that the quoted email is not authentic.   This does not surprise me in
the least bit.  Everything else that you have written just circumvents the issue
that I have raised.  I  challenged you to present evidence that what is quoted
is not authentic eMail from Bill Moore.  What part of "bring on the evidence
Ron" do you not understand?


         To which eMail from Wayne Mills do you refer?  I made no mention of an
    eMail from Wayne in my posting which was a reply to the concerns of Gary
  Smith.   Oh, you must be referring to my posting in which I gave the URL for
 Wayne's statement. I gave that URL info for your benefit Ron, just because you
                         might not have known about it.

       I clipped 3/4 of your post because I did not want to address that portion
and thereby prolong your grief.  See Ron, I prefer to keep things in context and
 avoid making any non relevant comments in  my reply .  Yes, let us not confuse
        the issues at hand by introducing new grief-stricken statements.

            No one asked for your (1) interpretation of Bill's eMail. Read the
 entire eMail from Bill Moore, and there should be little doubt that permission
                       was given to discuss the content.

         I doubt that there is any truth in your (4), because I am aware of what
has already been discussed by the Advisory Board members.  If you are upset that
             eQSL.cc did not give you notice, that is truly a shame.

          OKay, I will clip all of your comments, to allow you to feel better,
 lessen the bandwidth used, and not force others to read it again. You know what
  you wrote in (1) and (4), so you will have no problem comprehending, or will
                                      you?

Ron Notarius WN3VAW wrote:

>             NIL