[DSP-10] How about 432?
kd7ts
kd7ts at comcast.net
Thu Nov 22 10:41:32 EST 2012
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:43:18 -0800, Courtney Duncan
<cbduncan at earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> "Why not just build the DSP-10 up as a 432 system in the first place?"
> It could be called the DSP-12 or DSP-70 or something like that.
>
> Indulge me here. I take all risks. I'm just asking for a little
> consultation.
Hi CBD,
I think what you are contemplating is possible. It seems pretty ambitious,
but possible. 432 does not see much use here locally near Seattle, but it
can be a useful IF frequency for 24 GHz and higher bands.
A transverter for converting 432 to 144 is not trivial either, but does
not require any additional software, or modification of the existing
software and hardware.
I designed a transverter for high side injection, but underestimated the
amount of gain needed in the transmit chain. The biggest mistake was
working within the constraints of board size supported by ExpressPCB. The
whole thing looks cute, but only has a few milliwatts instead of the
intended 2 watts.(the goal was a replacement for an IC402 for a 24 GHz
transverter)
When the project is all finished, will you have met the goals of changing
the design ? In other words, are you doing this as a learning experience,
or, do you think this will be a useful radio ?
My effort on the transverter design was a learning experience, and not
particularly cheap. I did enjoy doing it, and learned enough that the next
iteration might be successful, and I still have a DSP-10 that works as
intended. Are you confident that after changing the design what remains
will be useful ?
I know this is well beyond my comfort level.
Consultation ? Not from here, just more questions.
It is fun to think about. The design that I like was done long ago by
Yaesu, the FT 736r. Basically plug in band modules with synthesizers in
each.
73 Mike KD7TS
More information about the DSP-10
mailing list