[DSP-10] New $99.00 EZ-Kit Lite (Blackfin family)
John B. Stephensen
[email protected]
Sat, 13 Dec 2003 05:37:44 -0000
Atmel's FPSLIC concept was using the FPGA as a DSP coprocessor for an AVR CPU.
The FPGA need only be configured for a few types of filtering operations so
programming could be limited to loading coefficients. A general-purpose MCU can
then perform all other operations. The ARM and MIPS 32-bit CPUs have development
tools available under a GNU license at no charge.
73,
John
KD6OZH
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lyle Johnson" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, 13 December, 2003 04:50 UTC
Subject: RE: [DSP-10] New $99.00 EZ-Kit Lite (Blackfin family)
> > This is always going to be a problem unless development tools are
> > in the public
> > domain. An FPGA-based DSP solution seems the best approach to me.
> > I did some
> > experimentation with FPSLICs but they are too slow and have no
> > growth path.
> > Spartan-3 FPGAs are fast and have enough memory to do useful DSP.
> > Although the
> > development tools are expensive, any resulting signal processor
> > can be public
> > domain.
>
> But if the FPGA-based DSP is a programmable one, we are back to the same
> problem: assembler/linker/compiler/simulator.
>
> Otherwise, it becomes a dedicated FPGA-DSP "programmed" in VHDL.
>
> I would think it would be not so very difficult to create at least a macro
> assembler for the available DSPs.
>
> But then, I am not a software type, so I am not a candidate to write one :-/
>
> For lower end apps, initially at least, where 20 to 30 MMIPS of 16-bit DSP
> performance is enough, the new dsPIC has free tools...
>
> -Lyle KK7P
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DSP-10 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dsp-10
>