[Drake] 4-Line Choices

[Jim Keasey]

Thank you. Very timely information as I await delivery of a set of 
B-Line twins.
Jim wd3it ..

On 01/12/2011 12:32 AM, Dave Edwards wrote:
> Those days, the twins were always better than the txcvr.  Drake, Heath, Swan, Collins...same deal.
> I also agree with Lee....any mods on the rig...I don't want it!  C line is the higher performer.. TR4cwRIT is sweet...but collector value has priced it through the roof!
> ....Dave
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jan 11, 2011, at 10:25 PM, "LEE BAHR"<pulsarxp at embarqmail.com>  wrote:
>
>> The twins are better for CW then a transciever.  I would go for the C line
>> for CW.  As for Sherwood mods.  In my book they mostly are BS.  When I get a
>> radio with them in there, I rip them out.  You will like the B or C line "as
>> is".  The transmitters are almost identical.
>>
>> Lee, w0vt
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> If one had to choose B-Line twins, C-line twins, or a TR4-CWRIT to be used
>>> primarily for CW and occasional SSB, which option would make the most
>>> sense. From what I have read, the C-Line requires modification (Sherwood)
>>> to make them shine. Does the TR4-CWRIT suffer from similar shortcomings on
>>> the receiver side? Perhaps this has been visited in prior postings, if so
>>> please feel free to indulge me directly. Thanks, John KE7TPA
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Drake mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/drake
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Drake at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ______________________________________________________________
> Drake mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/drake
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Drake at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>