[Drake] Need Input on the MN-2700 Tuner

[Jim DiMauro]

Hi All:

Many thanks to all who responded to my call for information on the MN-2700.
After reading and considering all responses, I've come to the conclusion
that the '2700 would not necessarily be the best choice for me.  I had hoped
that the '2700 was cut from the same "bulletproof" cloth as the MN-2000, but
I've learned from several respondents that it's not.  My understanding is
that the '2700 is a good performer, but it's not up to the quality standards
of the '2000.  The tank-like construction and heavy-duty components that
were used in the '2000 would have been my primary attraction to the '2700,
but since that doesn't seem to be the case I see no compelling reason to
search for a '2700.  I might as well get something newer, that hasn't had 25
years of use with possibly worn switches that would be "unobtanium" and a
real pain to replace.

So for now I'll keep my MN-2000 and find another way to get on 160.  I have
a pristine TenTec 238 that'll cover 160, but with its roller inductor it's
such a pain to tune when compared with my MN-2000 that I hate the thought of
using it as my primary tuner.  KB8TQ had suggested that I try adding some
external C to the MN-2000 to see if I could get it to do 160.  I'm willing
to try, but I wonder if the inductor is up to the task.  Has anyone tried
that?

Tnx again for the many helpful responses.  Great group!

Jim
WA2MER

-----Original Message-----
From: drake-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:drake-bounces at mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of Bob Camp
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 10:29 AM
To: jfd at warwick.net
Cc: Drake
Subject: Re: [Drake] Need Input on the MN-2700 Tuner


Hi

What kind of antenna are you trying to match on 160?

I'm not trying to talk you out of an MN-2700 it's a good tuner. There
is a possibility that you can add some outboard components (like more
C) to the MN-2000 and get to 160.

	Just a though ...

		Bob Camp
		KB8TQ

On Jan 9, 2005, at 12:19 AM, Jim DiMauro wrote:

> Hi All:
>
> I've been itching to get on 160 Meters, but my beloved MN-2000 won't
> get me
> there.  Before I put out a "Wanted To Buy" post for an MN-2700, I'd
> like
> some owners' impressions on how good a tuner it is.  My MN-2000 has
> been the
> perfect tuner for me, except for the lack of 160 Meter capability.  Is
> the
> '2700 as easy to tune, and has it proven to be as reliable?  The
> MN-2000 is
> built like a tank; is the '2700 cut from the same cloth?  Is there
> anything
> to watch out for when buying a '2700?
>
> Thoughts, guidance and opinions would be appreciated.
>
> Thanx & 73,
> Jim
> WA2MER
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Drake mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/drake
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:Drake at mailman.qth.net
>

______________________________________________________________
Drake mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/drake
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:Drake at mailman.qth.net