[Drake] Opinion on Drake receivers
Garey Barrell
k4oah at mindspring.com
Thu May 13 16:24:51 EDT 2004
Chris Pedder wrote:
>
> Doing Drake's design work as a customer did not make me very happy and,
> by the time the TR7 was introduced I had learned my lesson and kept my
> pocket book firmly in its place. Just as well from what I heard.
The early R-4C left something to be desired!! :-) I guess
that's what happens when you "convert" too many stages at once!
I have four TR-7's of various vintages, and find them to be
excellent transceivers. The receiver in particular is
outstanding, even today. There are very few if any that are
"quieter". The signals just pop up out of a very low noise
floor. I suppose you _could_ drive it into intermod with a big
enough antenna, but I haven't seen it happen yet. The
transmitter is stable and WAY underrated, as long as some "fixer"
hasn't tweaked the output power up to 200W output. (Which it
will do, with the optional fan, but you lose just about all
safety margin. They don't have 2000 memories, less than
effective DSP, or built-in keyers, but if one _does_ break
(none have yet) all but very few parts are standard,
multi-sourced, through-hole components. Try that with your
KenYaeCom ($8,000 !?!) wonder! :-)
> This is all along time ago and in spite of these experiences, they are
> still the greatest Radios! A few years back, just before Drake stopped
> supplying spare parts for the old radios, they supplied me with new
> front panels for a T4X, R4B and L7. Close on 30 years after they stopped
> producing them... what Japanese supplier can provide those parts even
> for current production models!
>
> Wish they still made them.
Me too!
73, Garey - K4OAH
Atlanta
More information about the Drake
mailing list