[CW] Thoughts on receiving CW
Richard Knoppow
1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com
Wed Apr 27 15:21:38 EDT 2022
The post I just sent got me thinking. Mainly about learning
code entirely by sound as opposed to writing it down. Its
interesting to me that the advice given in very old books is to
learn by writing. I think this is because the majority of those
interested wanted to get jobs as operators where writing was
absolutely necessary. The method was long hand. I had an old
military handbook (mostly just the ARRL "Learning the Code" book
in disguise) which taught printing. It had a system of printing
to increase the speed. Works up to maybe 15 WPM. Long hand is
faster but you have to have a good "fist" to be readable. I think
if you learn by writing it down you won't always be able to
recognize letters when just heard without writing. I think being
able to take code in writing is important but that one needs to
be able to recognize letters by sound alone. Some of the advice
in the old books really does not make sense, makes me wonder if
the people who wrote them could actually read code.
BTW, I have a couple of sounders. Code just sounds different
on a sounder than as tones, not the difference between American
and Continental code but the rendition on the instrument. Really
two different things.
--
Richard Knoppow
1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com
WB6KBL
More information about the CW
mailing list