[CW] How Old is the Closing "Dit Dit" on closing ham radio contacts?
Chris R. NW6V
chrisrut7 at gmail.com
Sat Aug 14 16:23:13 EDT 2021
I find it funny that in American Morse, my name "Chris" is:
Didit-dit di-di-di-dit dit-didit di-dit di-di-dit
All dits :-)
73 Chris NW6V
On Sat, Aug 14, 2021, 1:04 PM BURNS MARTIN JR <w4foa at comcast.net> wrote:
> Seems like I knew that but I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer - nor
> was I ever, hi
> 73
> Tony W4FOA
> > On 08/14/2021 3:55 PM Chris R. NW6V <chrisrut7 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Didit-dit is the American Morse "C" ="clear"
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 14, 2021, 12:03 PM BURNS MARTIN JR <w4foa at comcast.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I don't really know but it was commonplace in 1954 when I got my Novice
> > > license. At that time also, instead of QRL? QRL? many ole timers
> simply
> > > uses ie ie I like that better than the longer QRL? But then, all of
> that
> > > is personal preferences, I guess.
> > > 73
> > > Tony W4FOA
> > > > On 08/14/2021 11:17 AM Steve WD8DAS via CW <cw at mailman.qth.net>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Somewhere I recently read that some German government/military
> > > radiotelegraph operators during WWII did the dit-dit as well.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Steve WD8DAS
> > > >
> > > > sbjohnston at aol.com
> > > > http://www.wd8das.net/http://af4k-crystals.com
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Radio is your best entertainment value.
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: D.J.J. Ring, Jr. <n1ea at arrl.net>
> > > > To: CW Reflector <cw at mailman.qth.net>
> > > > Sent: Fri, Aug 13, 2021 11:46 pm
> > > > Subject: [CW] How Old is the Closing "Dit Dit" on closing ham radio
> > > contacts?
> > > >
> > > > How old is the "dit dit" you hear on ham radio when stations sign
> with
> > > each other?
> > > > Some say the "dit dit" came from "shave and a hair cut" but it didn't
> > > the roots of this went way back in radio history.
> > > > The "dit dit" was in commercial radiotelegraphy usage in the 1930s
> > > according to my friend Bob Shrader, W6BNB who worked for "Dollar Lines"
> > > passenger liners in the 1930s and later taught radio at U.S. Merchant
> > > Marine Academy at Kings Point, NY. I had asked him when this started
> and
> > > he said it was common as a handing off when signaling for a frequency
> shift
> > > after calling on 600 meters.
> > > >
> > > > Such an exchange would be like this - going back to stations that
> were
> > > active in the 1940s.
> > > >
> > > > WSL WSL WSL DE WIEA WIEA WIEA K (Steamship "Manhattan/WIEA" is
> > > calling Amagansett, Long Island, NY Radio (Mackay Radio) on 500 kc/s
> (kHz)
> > > (600 meters).
> > > > WIEA DE WSL R UP 640/633 K (Mackay Radio
> Amagansett,
> > > Long Island answers telling Manhattan to shift UP in wave to 640
> meters and
> > > listen for WSL on 633 meters.)
> > > > Then WIEA (SS MANHATTAN) would send:
> > > > R UP = (SS
> > > Manhattan says "Received, UP"
> > > > WSL (Amagansett Radio) would send:
> > > > =
> > > > WIEA would acknowledge WSL's sending (BT) by sending the two E's or
> 'dit
> > > dit'.
> > > > dit dit
> > > > WSL would acknowedge this with a simple singular dit.
> > > >
> > > > This was back when WSL was on 633 meters - or 474 kc/s (now kHz).
> > > > Coast Stations were assigned working frequencies.
> > > >
> > > > WSL was assigned 633 meters / 474 kc/s.
> > > >
> > > > Here are the assigned frequencies for the East Atlantic USA Coast.
> > > >
> > > > Callsign Frequency (Wavelength) Location
> Operating
> > > Company
> > > > =============================================================
> > > > WAG 418 (718) Thomaston, Maine
> Mackay
> > > Radio
> > > > WBF 436 (690) Hingham, Mass.
> > > Tropical Radio
> > > > WIM 406 (740) Chatham, Mass.
> > > R.M.C.A. (Radio Marine Corporation of America - RCA)
> > > > WSL 474 (633) Amagansett, L.I., NY
> > > Mackay Radio
> > > > WNY 442 (680) Brooklyn, NY
> > > R.M.C.A
> > > > WSC 462 (650) Tuckerton, NJ
> > > R.M.C.A
> > > > WMH 478 (628) Baltimore, Maryland
> > > R.M.C.A.
> > > > NAM 464 (647) Norfolk, Virginia
> > > U.S. Navy
> > > > WSV 408 (735) Savannah, Georgia
> R.M.C.A
> > > > WNW 438 (685) Phila, PA
> > > Tidewater Wireless Telegraph Company
> > > > WMR 418 (718) Jupiter, Fla
> > > Mackay Radio
> > > > WOE 394 (761) Lake Worth, Fla
> > > R.M.C.A
> > > > WAX 484 (620) Hialeah, Fla.
> > > Tropical Radio
> > > > NAR 464 (647) Key West, Fla.
> > > U.S. Navy
> > > > WPD 438 (685) Tampa, Fla.
> > > Privately Owned
> > > > WNU 448 (670) New Orleans, La.
> > > Tropical Radio
> > > >
> > > > In the 1980s to 1990s the situation would be much the same, but
> instead
> > > of giving wavelengths, we now used frequency, but with one interesting
> > > quirk.
> > > >
> > > > In the 1930s when Amagansett Radio / WSL told SS Manhattan to shift
> > > wavelength from 600 meters, he said to SS Manhattan/WIEA transmit on
> 640m
> > > and listen for WSL on 633m. - they sent UP because they shifted UP in
> > > wavelength.
> > > >
> > > > At some point, stations started using frequency in kilocycles per
> second
> > > instead of wavelength.
> > > >
> > > > So, let's give an example of one time I worked WSL Amagansett Long
> > > Island, NY radio from WILLIAMSBURGH;/WGOA - let's see how it was
> different
> > > and the same.
> > > >
> > > > The ship working frequencies (for sending message traffic) in 1920s
> were
> > > in kc/s (kHz) with meters in parenthesis.
> > > >
> > > > 400 (750), 410 (730), 425 (705), 454 (660), 468 (640), and ship and
> > > shore calling where both ships and shore stations kept a watch 500 kc/s
> > > (600m)
> > > >
> > > > So the calling frequency, 500 kc/s was the lowest wave that ships
> could
> > > use on that group of frequencies, so any other frequency was ALWAYS
> higher
> > > in wavelength, so it was always UP.
> > > >
> > > > Here's what happened in 1980:
> > > >
> > > > WSL WSL WSL DE WGOA WGOA WGOA K (Steamship
> "Williamsburgh/WGOA" is
> > > calling Amagansett, Long Island, NY Radio (Mackay Radio) on 500 kc/s
> (kHz)
> > > (600 meters).
> > > > WGOA DE WSL R UP 425/418 K (Mackay Radio
> Amagansett,
> > > Long Island answers telling Williamsburgh to shift UP to 425 kHz and
> listen
> > > for WSL on 418 kHz.) WSL's Frequency had changed over the years to
> 418 kHz.
> > > > Then WGOA (Williamsburgh) would send:
> > > > R UP =
> > > (Williamsburgh says "Received, UP"
> > > > WSL (Amagansett Radio) would send:
> > > > =
> > > > WGOA would acknowledge WSL's sending (BT) by sending the two E's or
> 'dit
> > > dit'.
> > > > dit dit
> > > >
> > > > WSL would acknowledge this with a simple singular dit.
> > > >
> > > > This Morse "dance" of <BT> which is = then acknowledged by - then by
> a
> > > dit dit then a single dit carried on for nearly 80 years when Morse
> finally
> > > ended in 1999.
> > > >
> > > > The funniest thing is that stations continued to send UP when they
> told
> > > the other station to shift to their working frequency!
> > > >
> > > > 73
> > > > DR
> > > > N1EA______________________________________________________________
> > > > CW mailing list
> > > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
> > > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > > > Post: mailto:CW at mailman.qth.net
> > > > CW List ARCHIVES: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/cw/
> > > > Unsubcribe send email to
> > > > cw-unsubscribe at mailman.qth.net
> > > > Subscribe send email to cw-subscribe at mailman.qth.net
> > > > Support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> > > >
> > > > =30=______________________________________________________________
> > > > CW mailing list
> > > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
> > > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > > > Post: mailto:CW at mailman.qth.net
> > > > CW List ARCHIVES: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/cw/
> > > > Unsubcribe send email to
> > > > cw-unsubscribe at mailman.qth.net
> > > > Subscribe send email to cw-subscribe at mailman.qth.net
> > > > Support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> > > >
> > > > =30=
> > > ______________________________________________________________
> > > CW mailing list
> > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
> > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > > Post: mailto:CW at mailman.qth.net
> > > CW List ARCHIVES: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/cw/
> > > Unsubcribe send email to
> > > cw-unsubscribe at mailman.qth.net
> > > Subscribe send email to cw-subscribe at mailman.qth.net
> > > Support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> > >
> > > =30=
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > CW mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:CW at mailman.qth.net
> > CW List ARCHIVES: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/cw/
> > Unsubcribe send email to
> > cw-unsubscribe at mailman.qth.net
> > Subscribe send email to cw-subscribe at mailman.qth.net
> > Support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >
> > =30=
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/cw/attachments/20210814/723f3b8e/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the CW
mailing list