[CW] Elimination of CW-Only Sub-bands

wealsowalk at aol.com wealsowalk at aol.com
Thu May 19 14:17:23 EDT 2016


Danny, I think that even on 160 the CW guys still typically mostly operate at the lower end.    Here I generally tune the antenna to work at the lower end and if I must use phone there is always the tuner in the shack.
Bill
AC6QV
Roseburg, Oregon
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Danny Douglas <n7dc at comcast.net>
To: Reflector, CW <cw at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Wed, May 18, 2016 10:29 am
Subject: Re: [CW] Elimination of CW-Only Sub-bands




"This petitioner apparently doesn't understand that there are currently only two
amateur radio frequency bands where all license classes are restricted to using CW
only. These are the 6 Meter and 2 Meter bands."  
 Reading that, I almost dropped dead, and had to look at my chart, cause I have been using voice and RTTY on both bands for decades.   Later on, he clarified that as to they are the bands that have a CW ONLY portion.   I pretty much agree with the rest of that, but want to clarify that we need an area, even in those bands, where we keep our data transmission away from CW - and this is provided, although I certainly don't understand why those cw only portions are so small, given the very wide band to start with.  
    Back in the day, it was all "antenna bandwidth" so if one had an antenna for one end of the band (cw for us aficionados) it was hard to get a good SWR for voice down there.   160 meters, where we do not have even that small portion of CW only, could certainly use it.  





From: "Donald Chester" <k4kyv at charter.net>
To: "CW Reflector" <cw at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 10:43:07 PM
Subject: Re: [CW] Elimination of CW-Only Sub-bands




Here is an example of a commenter who understood the proposal.
 
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=60001740065

 
 
Here is an example of a one who misinterpreted it.
 
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=60001740081 

______________________________________________________________
CW mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:CW at mailman.qth.net
CW List ARCHIVES: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/cw/
Unsubcribe send email to
cw-unsubscribe at mailman.qth.net
Subscribe send email to cw-subscribe at mailman.qth.net
Support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



=30=



______________________________________________________________
CW mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:CW at mailman.qth.net
CW List ARCHIVES: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/cw/
Unsubcribe send email to
cw-unsubscribe at mailman.qth.net
Subscribe send email to cw-subscribe at mailman.qth.net
Support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

=30=
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/cw/attachments/20160519/ed1fc33e/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the CW mailing list