[CW] Frattini Bug
D. Chester
k4kyv at charter.net
Fri Jun 25 10:17:34 EDT 2010
>> On Frattini's bug there are individual
>> pivots for the dit and dah swing. Tension
>> is via opposing magnets except for the
>> extra magnet for the dit swing which is
>> located out front opposite where the dit
>> spring is attached to the swing bar. It
>> would seem to me this magnet is attracting.
>>
>> de Joe, aa4nn
> The extra magnet on the Fratinni Semi-automatica (bug) is to eliminate
> "extra rebounds" according to Alberto.
> David N1EA
Interesting. I have seen magnetic electronic keyer paddles; in fact I own
one, but this is the first time I have ever heard of the concept being used
with a bug. I assume the Fratinni is of recent design, not a vintage piece.
At Dayton I picked up a March magnetic key. It is different from the others
in that the magnets are set up to repel instead of attract. Sounds like
Frattini's bug works the same way.
I also have a Bencher key, that uses springs (whenever it doesn't fall apart
while in use). I like the March much better. Has a solid feel, whereas the
Bencher feels flimsy and hard to control. I have tried out (I believe) a
Vibroplex magnetic key, whose magnets are set up to attract, and I noticed
the same touchy hard-to-control feel.
I can actually send code with the March, whereas with the Bencher, after
about 5 minutes I start making mistakes every other letter.
But I still use my well-worn 1925-era Vibroplex Original 99% of the time. I
easily got the hang of iambic keying, and can switch between bug and keyer
with no problem, but I am still far more comfortable using the bug. Maybe I
just need to practise more with the keyer before trying to use it on the
air.
I have several bugs, but that old Vibroplex is velvet smooth, with hardly
any contact bounce. My others, including a 1947-era Original, are stiff and
have so much contact bounce that the keying sounds mushy. My military bug,
a Lionel J-36 (IIRC), wouldn't slow down below about 30 wpm until I filed
down the pendulum spring, and its contact bounce is worse than that of the
1947 Original. I have tried various methods of damping the dit contact
springs in both bugs to no avail.
Don k4kyv
_______________________________________________________________
This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.
http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak/
http://gigliwood.com/abcd/
More information about the CW
mailing list