[CW] Learning hints
Henry Mei'l's
meils at get2net.dk
Fri Jan 15 09:41:34 EST 2010
A split receive-transmit CW tone-frequency can be achieved by simultaneously keying a local audio oscillator or an RF activated CW monitor while deactivating or dampening the rig's built-in tone generator.
Also, to achieve the most comfortable received CW tone frequency, signals can be tone frequency adujsted (and shaped) in a re-generator circuit where the incoming signal triggers a tone and bandwidth adjustable local audio oscillator. If desired, this "virtual signal" can be heard simultaneously with the "real" CW signal. I thought I invented this in the early 60's and I still have my unit where rectified receiver audio triggers a relay- controlled audio oscillator. It still works. I even submitted the idea to the US Navy. However, my further research showed that the idea was first brought out in the 30's - One later commercial unit is called the "Scrubber" (scubs the signal clean!). Several versions have been published in ham radio magazines.
73s Henry OZ1UF
----- Original Message -----
From: D.J.J. Ring, Jr.
To: CW Reflector
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: [CW] Learning hints
Another "odd" thing about tones is that many (including myself) prefer to have a different sending tone than receiving tone.
Perhaps because I can "copy" better with one tone, but like the "sound" of another tone.
This will be a problem for those who zero beat using "matching sidetone to "on-the-air" tone as since the tones don't match, the operator will be off zero beat.
73
DR
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 5:40 AM, <meils at get2net.dk> wrote:
My experience is that after a longer period of contiuous operation, I get
"deaf" at the particular tone frequency being used and the cure is to
shift to another tone (I usually find a lower tone best - depending on how
high the original frequency was). In general, I find that at speeds of
over 20 wpm, I prefer 500-800 Hz. My hearing seems to peak at about 1 kHz
but I
don´t find 1 kHz a comfortable operating frequency.
73s Henry - OZ1UF
> John Seney wrote:
>> Hi Folks:
>>
>> What is the best pitch to listen to CW?
>>
>> I note most radios are settable but default to 600 Hz. Many training
>> sets use 680 Hz or higher.
>>
>> I've heard some suggest that one should spot the natural tone in your
>> own mind as "your frequency".
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> After a bit of experimenting I settled on 800Hz, 600Hz felt a bit too
> low for fast CW.
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> CW mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:CW at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
______________________________________________________________
CW mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:CW at mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
______________________________________________________________
CW mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:CW at mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.725 / Virus Database: 270.14.141/2622 - Release Date: 01/14/10 20:35:00
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/cw/attachments/20100115/f5f771fb/attachment.html
More information about the CW
mailing list