[CW] AR or K after CQ?
D. Chester
k4kyv at charter.net
Tue Jul 21 17:31:56 EDT 2009
I got into what turned into a heated debate recently over the use of AR
following a CQ.
The other person said you should never send anything but K after a CQ, and
that it is poor operating to use AR.
Isn't AR supposed to mean that you have made a call, and you are standing
by, listening for a station you have not yet made contact with? For example,
if I had a sked with W9XXX and gave him a call, I would send W9XXX W9XXX de
K4KYV AR. Once I hear his reply and we have established contact, I would
then send W9XXX de K4KYV K (or KN).
When I call CQ and stand by to listen, by definition, no contact has yet
been established with the station I eventually contact. So wouldn't the
appropriate prosign be AR? To me, K implies that we have established contact
and I am telling him to "go ahead".
I looked this up in some of my old books both ARRL and non-ARRL. Some of
the more recent editions seem to prefer K, but Handy's first edition of the
ARRL handbook from the late 20's used ._._. (AR).
I say it is a matter of preference. Who would be the "authority" in such a
matter? I have heard it both ways in all the 50 years I have been
licensed. To me, AR has a more pleasant swing for ending a CQ, and it seems
to better round out the transmission. K seems too abrupt. I have never had
a problem getting someone to answer my CQ after sending AR.
Don k4kyv
_______________________________________________________________
This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.
http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak/
http://gigliwood.com/abcd/
More information about the CW
mailing list