[CW] Re: Numbers stations

[Danny Douglas]

Then why bother with CW.  If they were going to use computers, why not just
go to a digital mode such as Packet/RTTY, PSK?

And yes, I a word out.

Danny Douglas
N7DC
ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA
SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB
All 2 years or more (except Novice)
Pls QSL direct, buro, or LOTW preferred,
I Do not use, but as a courtesy do upload to eQSL for
those who do.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ron Youvan" <ka4inm at tampabay.rr.com>
To: "CW Reflector" <cw at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: [CW] Re: Numbers stations


> >   Otherwise, someone has to still
> > be training operators to copy Morse code.
>
>    Computers can send and receive cw, and at very high speeds,
> lower speeds are more noise immune.
> -- 
>     Ron  KA4INM - Spell check and proof read your messages to see if you
any words out.
> _______________________________________________
> CW mailing list
> CW at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.20/1666 - Release Date: 9/11/2008
7:03 AM