[CW] I don't get it?
wealsowalk at aol.com
wealsowalk at aol.com
Tue Nov 25 17:04:26 EST 2008
Don, I am on the periphery of our experimental groups on 500 Kc. there
are several groups in the US and yes, the use of the band is old, but
most of the 3/4 century of work is for communication over water where
ships were heard all over the world. Over land, the situation is
different and most of the communication appears to be by groundwave,
although there have been a number of contacts over several thousand
miles. Furthermore, the work is done at fairly low power, not QRP by
any means, but low compared to previous work and the antennae in use
are all electrically short, so the radiation resistance is low and the
effective power out bare hundreths of what a 1/4 wave would put out.
Further, the technology that there is a great deal of experience with
is also all old and one of the positive goals is to learn what newer
technology can do. Some, of course, are just implementing older
equipment. For example I know that at least one of the group members
was just this week attempting to purchase a TAJ-19 which is a WWII
transimitter that naval aviation used, but it is not necessarily the
transmitter that is the experiment. Receivers also are in the
experiment as well as receive antennaes. If you tune your yeacomwood
to 505-515 kHz (where the original group is at), you probably will not
hear anything and for several reasons. First your antenna is wrong.
Some people are using s
hort electric probes with wideband preamps to
hear with. Also, your radio desensitizes between 500 Khz and about
1800 Khz because the broadcast band is so strong that the manufacturers
deliberately desensitize the receivers for that region. But even if
you have a proper receiver/antenna, depending upon where you are, you
still might not hear anything, even with very narrow CW filters,
because the signals you are looking for are well under the noise. Some
are attempting to use PSK31 because that is a low signal approach.
Another is QRSS CW. QRSS means very slow. So slow that a computer can
scan the region of the signal hundreds of times or more during a single
dit. Doing that averages the random noise out, but leaves any peak
that was a signal. There are many other new technologies that will be
applied to the experiment. Of course, there is also now a toe in the
door that may result in additional band spectra for HAMs everywhere
depending upon another part of the experiment: Can just anybody do
this? What happens when I live in an apartment and try to send a
signal out on this band? Do I get into the neighbors telephones?
Sure, out on the farm you can put up a big signal and have a big
antenna, but at your house, with a short antenna that is loosing most
of its signal, how badly do we get into our neighbors AM radio? Where
does the signal go? There are litera
lly hundreds of questions that
need to be answered before the FCC will allocate a band down there to
the HAMs. Thus it is an experiment to find out. WARC has given a 500
KHz allocation, but the FCC has not, except in the case of the
experimental licenses.
I hope this is a help to your understanding.
Bill Isakson
AC6QV
California
-----Original Message-----
From: D. Chester <k4kyv at charter.net>
To: cw at mailman.qth.net
Sent: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:35 pm
Subject: Re: [CW] I don't get it?
> What is "experimental" about the 500kHz neighborhood? It's not like
this > is some newly discovered spectrum, never used before. Yet the
FCC issues > "experimental" licenses to operate there, and now I see
the Canadians are > doing the same. What are hams going to learn that
isn't already well > known from the nearly-100-years or so of previous
use?
>
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
The previous users for the most part didn't have the kind of antenna
and financial limitations most amateurs have, and amateur communication
is different in many ways from commercial. The "experimental" aspect is
to discover what amateurs can actually do in that frequency range under
the circumstances with what we have available.
Don k4kyv
_______________________________________________
CW mailing list
CW at mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
More information about the CW
mailing list