[CW] Phone Operator's Ten Best Reasons for not getting on CW

[Artmouton]

David I must confess that I do have a D 104 for my Valiant for AM.
On the other hand 99% of my operating is CW.  I am really trying for Honor 
Roll on CW but it ain't easy.
I have been using an old Yaesu FT-1 - it is a good CW rig but getting too 
old
I played around with a K3 and was impressed with its low noise.
Art K5FNQ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Ring" <n1ea at arrl.net>
To: "CW Reflector" <cw at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: [CW] Phone Operator's Ten Best Reasons for not getting on CW


> Art,
>
> I really don't know.  I have a Ten-Tec transceiver.  Unlike other
> transceivers, it comes without either a microphone or Morse key - but
> both are options.  I still had the Morse key from my Novice days - so
> I used that.  I think it is some type of "micro phone" - you know, a
> small telephone, like a cell phone.  I didn't get one because of all
> the roaming charges I'd get when I worked DX.
>
> 73
>
> DR
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Artmouton <k5fnq at cox.net> wrote:
>> What's a microphone?
>> Art K5FNQ
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Ring" <n1ea at arrl.net>
>> To: "CW Reflector" <cw at mailman.qth.net>
>> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 2:23 AM
>> Subject: [CW] Phone Operator's Ten Best Reasons for not getting on CW
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CW mailing list
> CW at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
>