[CW] New Receiverless RTTY mode?

[Ken Lotts]

RTTY on the CW QRP calling freq 7040 seems to be the height of poor
practice.  Perhaps the RTTY/non morse digital modes should be allotted a
fenced in bandspace that keeps them out of the CW QRP sections of the band
since the two can not co-exist in the same space.  One mode (RTTY) should
not be capable of bullying another (QRP CW) out of existance.  If hams were
honorable they would not be bullys anyhow.

Ken Lotts
aa7jc

-----Original Message-----
From: cw-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:cw-bounces at mailman.qth.net]On
Behalf Of David Ring
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 5:44 AM
To: cw at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [CW] New Receiverless RTTY mode?


What is CW?  You mean those signals that are interfering with my RTTY?
 My digital filters take care of that - but that CW stuff sure is an
annoyance, that's why I turn down the audio and just watch the screen.
 It's printing good now.

73

Digital David
42 years of radio sent by digits.

On 6/10/07, Ken, KA0W <ka0w at spamcop.net> wrote:
> Where do I find info on running "receiverless" RTTY?
>
> Amazing how s9+ RTTY signals appear on top of CW QSOs. New RTTY ops must
be
> able to use less than the 100 Hz IF BW and 25 Hz audio BW I use on CW.
>
> Could the answer be in the new RTTY software that is now available that
> enables a unknowing fool to run RTTY? Ops don't have a speaker on their
rigs
> anymore?
>
> Truely amazing how quicky operating technique has slipped into the diaper
> pail!
>
> Ken, KA0W
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CW mailing list
> CW at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
>
_______________________________________________
CW mailing list
CW at mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw