[CW] FCC Actions - OOOOPS?
K0HB
k-zero-hb at earthlink.net
Fri Oct 13 23:07:21 EDT 2006
N2EY said:
> If I understand correctly, you're saying that a *real* incentive
> to upgrade would be to get something you don't have now,
> rather than to keep something you already have.
That's an excellent summary!
And a *real* dis-incentive would be to lose something you already have
unless consent to upgrade to retain it.
For example, if this R&O survives the upcoming foma ("shit-storm" for those
who don't read KVG) there is a disincentive to remain General because your
CW/rtty/data band on 80m just got shrunk from 225kHz to 75kHz. Thus my
term, "dis-incentive licensing".
> The odd thing is that back then the 'phone band was 3800-4000 - the
> same as what Generals will have under the new rules.
> And the original incentive licensing take-away gave Generals
> 3900-4000 - exactly half the band....
> So we have come full circle for Generals in 38 years.
For *phone* operation, you're correct. The Generals finally got back what
they lost way back then. About time.
But we weren't talking about phone.
We were talking about the 150kHz of CW/rtty/data space that they lose if
this R&O stands as written. Wanna wager who long "full circle for
Generals" will be this time around?
73, de Hans, K0HB
--
" The dust will not settle in our time. And when it does some
great roaring machine will come and whirl it all skyhigh again."
More information about the CW
mailing list