[CW] Re: [MT63] Re: 20 kHz wide Digital Proposal

[Mike Brown]

Ok, maybe I haven't really asked because I thought this was some sort of 
internet fable.

Just exactly who is proposing a 20 khz wide mode for hf, and what is it ?

Mike, K9MI


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brian Carling" <bcarling at cfl.rr.com>
To: <MT63 at yahoogroups.com>; <hamradioam at topica.com>; 
<flboatanchors at yahoogroups.com>; <MOPAGROUP at yahoogroups.com>; 
<DCBOATANCHORS at topica.com>; <cw at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 23:19
Subject: [CW] Re: [MT63] Re: 20 kHz wide Digital Proposal


> On 11 Mar 2005 at 11:21, dubose at texas.net wrote:
>
>> If hams are to be able to help out in these "disasters" then we need
>> to meet this need.
>
>> If we don't meet this need, then Congress may very well take away our
>> ham bands
>
> Brilliant, Walt!
> SO NOW you are saying that if amateur radio doesn't become
> completely covered with 20 kHz signals we are going to have
> it all taken away anyway. After all that is what it will take for
> us to all LEARN this "great new HF HSMM mode" I presume...
>
> Oh well, why try to defend our spectrum against BPL then?
> It will soon all be covered up with hash sounds.
>
> Wait till the CW and phone boys get a hold of this one!
>
> I have never read ANYTHING from any one of  the gazillion
> organizations you cite where they demanded that we
> quickly pass 4 Terabytes of data on HF for them or they
> will lobby congress to abolish amateur radio.
>
> Really this is utterly strange!
>
> _______________________________________________
> CW mailing list
> CW at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
>