[CW] ARRL MUST GET BETTER
KD5NWA
KD5NWA at cox.net
Sun Mar 6 01:20:04 EST 2005
Discuss it with whom? I emailed my previous Section manager to ask how
he voted on some issues, he told me it was "personal" and wouldn't care
to discuss it. Personal? He is supposed to be my representative!
K0HB wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Brian Carling" <bcarling at cfl.rr.com>
>
>
>
>>Here is my explanation:
>>http://www.af4k.com/Ham/dissent.htm
>>
>>
>>
>
>Thank you Captain Single Issue! I read the jeremiads you pointed to, and
>find it is not >>your<< explanation at all, but a collection of comment by a
>variety of folks.
>
>If you can discard all the good work of ARRL in protest of this single
>committee, then your statement claiming "I have loved and believed in for
>over 30 years" rings rather hollow.
>
>I certainly don't see eye-to-eye with ARRL on some matters and I'm not
>bashful about debating those issues, but dropping out on the basis of those
>few disagreements would be similar to splitting with K0CKB because I didn't
>like her meatloaf!
>
>73, de Hans, K0HB
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CW mailing list
>CW at mailman.qth.net
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
>
>
>
--
Cecil
KD5NWA
<www.qrpradio.com>
'Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then beat you
with experience.' -anon
More information about the CW
mailing list