[CW] Morse Code for us slow pokes
Marshall Emm
mgemm at mtechnologies.com
Tue Jul 20 20:08:57 EDT 2004
Mike said--
>>For this reason, I would suggest that proper etiquette is to not answer a
higher speed CQ at a very low speed but to call one's own CQ at whatever
speed he prefers to operate. That way the fellow who answers will know
what he's getting into.
<<
You've hit the nail on the head-- but where are newbies supposed to learn the
etiquette? There's a wealth of topics that make up what we sometimes refer to
as "good operating practice," including but probably not limited to
procedures, prosigns and Q signals, customs, jargon, and etiquette. These
things used to be learned over time, as one progressed from apprentice through
journeyman to master, or dare I say Novice through General to Extra. Most of us
older guys worked with one or a series of Elmers, who always took pains to
instill the wisdom of the ages and the rules of the road. Today you get a
piece of paper from the FCC which says you can legally call CQ at 5wpm (or
answer one!) anywhere you like-- there is simply no way for the newcomer to
learn the etiquette (or even good procedure) unless he goes out and looks for
it!
The etiquette of speed is stated pretty simply-- call CQ at the speed you want
to operate, answer CQ's that are at the speed you want to operate. Answering a
CQ that is substantially faster or slower than you want to (or can) operate is
just bad manners. As is asking a guy to QRS if he has responded at the speed
you are using! In fact, you should never have to ask a guy to slow down unless
a) he has sped up for some reason, or b) his sending has deteriorated, or c)
conditions have deriorated from QRM/N. But I digress.
Back in the old days, everybody pretty much observed the etiquette so it was
also a given that you would answer anybody who called you. If the guy was a
lot slower, you assumed he knew the "rules" and had a good reason for calling
you anyhow. Could be a guy on a sinking boat, sending with a broken arm,
whatever. And a good op knows how to cut a conversation short, too.
And another old "rule" has fallen by the way side-- the slower you are, the
more you should abbreviate and use codes! If you answer a 15wpm CQ at 10WPM,
and the fast op slows down for you, you are just going to irritate him if you
insist on spelling out "THANK YOU FOR THE CALL. YOUR RST IS 599 ? 599. MY NAME
IS..." etc.
But AGAIN, how is anybody supposed to know this stuff?? I'm far more likely to
speed up again and send "SRI OM QRM TKS QSO 73 SK" than try to explain it or
ask for a little more efficiency, or explain that if I gave you a 5 anything
report you don't need to repeat anything. And it's not just CW-- guys put up
with poor procedure on phone without saying anything, too. The one mode
exception would be 2M FM, where you very quickly get told off if you say
something "wrong." [g]
So... there are breaches of etiquette on both sides, but the only solution that
I can see, apart from individual case-by-case attempts by more experienced ops
to help the newbies, is for somebody to write up a friendly, general discussion
of good CW operating practice and GET IT HANDED OUT TO EVERYBODY WHO PASSES A
MORSE TEST. Which will never happen, because the VEC's don't want to encourage
the use and enjoyment of CW.
[Sigh...]
73
Marshall Emm
N1FN/VK5FN
n1fn at MorseX.com
Morse Express and Oak Hills Research
"Everything for the Morse Enthusiast"
http://www.MorseX.com
http://www.ohr.com
(303)752-3382
--
More information about the CW
mailing list