[CW] Elmer, anyone?

[N7DC@cs.com]

In a message dated 1/23/2004 11:05:06 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
k-zero-hb@earthlink.net writes: 
> http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/01/22/2/?nc=1At
> 
n a message dated 1/23/2004 11:05:06 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
k-zero-hb@earthlink.net writes: 
> http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/01/22/2/?nc=1At
> 
For crying out loud.  Now we are gonna have to be "licensed" to be a 
"mentor."  
Frankly, if a club or group is not already doing such, this aint gonna push 
them to do it.  If you cant persuade people to do something as a volunteer, 
then legislate it?


Defining subbands by bandwidth versus modes sounds good to a point.  I hope 
they dont say that CW and Digi modes are part of one subband though.  Can you 
imagine having to put up with digital on top of every cw signal on the band?


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment.  Attachments are not allowed.  To learn how
to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html  ---