[Re: [CW] ARRL CW Survey]

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 19:36:44 -0400

Come on! Let's stop kidding ourselves.  Even novices on reading skills can
easily peruse the handrwiting on the (ARRL's) wall...

73 Pedro KP3X..

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brad Farrell" <[email protected]>
To: "Thomas Beaudry" <[email protected]>; "CW" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: [CW] ARRL CW Survey]

I fully support retention of the CW requirement.  To my knowledge, the
League
has never polled the membership regarding keeping the CW requirement.  If
the
League wants to properly poll its members, it should include a form in an
issue of QST coded with the membership number (perhaps like a ballot for
director or section manager).  The web-based poll is subject to manipulation
from outside elements, and therefore unreliable.

73, Brad K4RT

Thomas Beaudry <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks, just voted. So far we're way ahead of the "drop morse
> from testing" crowd.

I just voted but there isn't much of a lead anymore.

-- 
Thomas M. Beaudry
k8la / ys1ztm
K2 # 3422

_______________________________________________
CW mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw

_______________________________________________
CW mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw