[CW] FCC's Attitude toward BPL!

[N7DC@cs.com]

"I saw nothing in Ms. Abernathy's comments that in any way impedes the 
amateur radio service."

Apparently you read a different statement than I did.  Her background, then 
turning right around and being on a commission which regulates what she had 
been working on/supporting, at the very least, is touching on the illegal.  Any 
other government employee int allowed to do that.  Supporting and passing this 
type of operation will impede not only on amateur radio, but EVERY type of HF 
operation, and up into and thru 80 Megs.  



In a message dated 9/28/03 10:24:19 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
Chipn1ir@aol.com writes: 
> Get out of the way of the FCC and let it do its job.  In my opinion, they 
> know what they're doing.
> 
> It appears that in her opinion she knows what she is doing too, and she may 
> indeed know exactly what she is doing.  It just is not in the best interest 
> of any except those who want to provide BPL services.  


."If YOU BELIEVE THIS IS NOT SO, THEN 
PLEASE PRESENT EVIDENCE to that effect."


  The evidence must be provided by the BPL people, who are covered under part 
15, not by the users of RF who are licensed users.  If you have seen the much 
publicized tests, and cannot recognize the problem, then you must work for a 
"BPL to be provider."  I cant imagine any one else who would support this 
movement.  

73, 


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment.  Attachments are not allowed.  To learn how
to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html  ---