[CW] Re: QSK?
res075cz
[email protected]
Fri, 14 Mar 2003 20:15:18 -0600
Good question and I don't understand it either. I always use QSK and like
being able to interrupt when there is a necessity. It makes for better
conversation in my opinion.
I have had Ten-Tec rigs and agree they have great QSK. But so had my
TS-570DG, IC-746 and now my IC-756PRO. The relay in my Ten-Tec Centaur
amplifier is kind of loud but has great QSK and I like the sounds of the
clicks.
73 de Jim, K5ROV...
James (Jim) Parsons, K5ROV, CMSgt (E-9), USAF, Ret., San Angelo, TX
Ham for over 60 yrs. 80% CW, 10 % digital, 10 % phone.
[email protected], QCWA, ARCI, Fists, ARRL, ARMS.
EX: W1RLA, K5FBB, K4FEO, SV0WN (CRETE), SV0WN (RHODES),
DL4NC, DL4JP, KA2FC (JAPAN), KA2JP (JAPAN).
JOHN 3:16
----- Original Message -----
From: "kburrows" <[email protected]>
To: "W2AGN" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 19:32 PM
Subject: Re: [CW] Re: QSK?
> I use a Kenwood 570, it has QSK, u can hear the relay a bit but I like the
> sound of the relay clicking, reminds me of old HF transmitters, they made
a
> lot of noise...it seems to work very well at my speeds of around 30 wpm...
>
> I wish everyone would use QSK, its kind of boring to just sit and listen
to
> someone for about 5 mins, then send back for 5 minutes trying to remember
> what the other op was saying... what if the phone rings or nature calls??
or
> QRM etc .. XYL interruptions (QRM 5) QSK is a lot of fun...
>
> I wonder why more ops dont use QSK???
>
> 73
> VE1DS
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "W2AGN" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 5:37 PM
> Subject: [CW] Re: QSK?
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > How come none of the big Japanese manufacturers seem to be able to
include
> > QSK? All my good CW rigs are US made, either the Elecraft, or Tentec. I
> even
> > have a nice old Atlas 350XL which has excellent, relayless QSK. Even the
> > Yaesu FT-817 has only "semi" break-in.
> >
> > Is it because CW is no interest in Japan? Just curious.
> >
> > +-++-++-++-++-+ John L. Sielke
> > |W||2||A||G||N| http://www.w2agn.net [UPDATED]
> > +-++-++-++-++-+ Ex-K3HLU,TF2WKT,W7JEF,W4MPC,N4JS
> > _______________________________________________
> > CW mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.461 / Virus Database: 260 - Release Date: 3/10/03
>
> _______________________________________________
> CW mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
>