[CW] Bad things

Wed, 16 Jul 2003 18:18:52 -0400

Imagine loosing the first 50 khz of 40 to SSB so that they have 3/4 of the 200 khz band for ssb.  Remember, for several more years, this isnt taking effect, so its possible the FCC might move on that first.   

  "Scott Rosenfeld [N7JI]" <[email protected]> wrote:

>The CW bands will be fine, I suspect - it's up to all of us to keep 
>teaching it.
>
>I'm personally THRILLED about the 40m progress!
>
>Imagine almost no SSB ops impinging on the low end of 40!
>
>Imagine no broadcasters from 7100-7200! �
>
>Imagine working DX SSB without working split! �(not that it bothers me 
>that much)
>
>Scott
>
>On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, David J. Ring Jr - N1EA wrote:
>
>> I don't know if Mr. Sumner is very happy about this - I asked him about this
>> when I saw him last Wednesday 9 July 2002 - but he avoided the subject and
>> only talked about 40 meters - telling me how difficult it was to get a clear
>> band for amateurs. �I think he is much prouder of the 40 meter success.
>> 
>> > Mr. Sumner is very happy announcing the "end of the CW mandatory test" and
>> I want to know why the IARU crew loss equity in this way.
>> >
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CW mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
>> 
>
>-- 
>Scott Rosenfeld �ARS N7JI
>541-684-9970 �Eugene, OR �Land o' much rain
>If you find me on the air, I'm probably in my car
>[email protected] �http://w3eax.umd.edu/~ham
>
>_______________________________________________
>CW mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
>