[CW] ARRL position

Sat, 5 Jul 2003 21:47:28 -0400

OK - so do we have ONE member of this reflector in EVERY ARRL SECTION?

And one man or woman who wants DIRECTOR in EACH division?

Then we could represent the members!

Nomenations anyone?

73

DR
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 8:15 PM
Subject: Re: [CW] ARRL position

> No, the ARRL is NOT there to sell advertising.  They are there to
> representment me and the thousands of other members.  The problem is we
talk about "they"
> as the ARRL, instead of "US" which it should be.     WE voted, and the
side
> that wanted to maintain status quo won.  ARRL management said "OK" and
then
> before we knew it, changed their minds and supported the minority.  I do
not know
> exactly when or how that happened, but as far as I am concerned there
should
> be a recall on EVERY elected official and management type that supported
that
> outlook, against the wishes of the majority.  After all, they are there
> because we put them there, and for purposes for which we put them there.
If they
> cannot follow our instructions, then we should be rid of them.   WE need
to make
> ourselves heard, loud and long.  Speak on it.  Write on it.  Call on it.
> Just DO IT.  We have lost a battle, and the war appears to be going the
other
> way, and it certainly will if we roll over and let them have their way
without a
> fight- nay a battle.
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
> or had an attachment.  Attachments are not allowed.  To learn how
> to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html  ---
> _______________________________________________
> CW mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
>