[CW] ARRL Lobby

[Thomas Beaudry]

>   I think that the "litmus test" is whether or not the 501(c)(3) 
> organization involves itself in political activity that would 
> financially benefit a particular candidate and/or political party.  
> For example, if the ARRL got involved in the election/re-election 
> campaign of a particular congress-critter, that would not be allowed 
> for a 501(c)(3) organization.  They can't give $1000 to Sen. Smith for 
> his re-election because he did (or might) sign on to a specific piece 
> of legistation dealing with ham radio.
>   They can lobby the politicians about "issues" that affect their 
> "membership".  They can go to Sen. Smith and "educate" him about ham 
> radio, encourage him to support a piece of legislation - even give him 
> some free publicity about his support.  That is all allowed, as long 
> as no money changes hands.

It's related to the soft/hard money campaign contributions.  As you 
said, they can get involved as they want in "issues".  That's a free 
speech matter.  But targeting politicians is a no-no.

-- 
Thomas M. Beaudry
k8la / ys1ztm
K2 # 3422