[CW] The return of CW

[Mike Hyder - N4NT -]

You obviously haven't seen "Independence Day."

Mike

----- Original Message -----
From: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
To: "Paul" <marconi@maltanet.net>
Cc: <cw@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: [CW] The return of CW


> Paul, infinitely more complex encryption codes are used on the Internet
> than Morse and 5-digit words. I really doubt that it would afford much
> security . . .
>
> 72/73/oo, George W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas
> Fairview, TX 30 mi NE of Dallas in Collin county EM13qe
> Amateur Radio W5YR, in the 56th year and it just keeps getting better!
> QRP-L 1373 NETXQRP 6 SOC 262 COG 8 FPQRP 404 TEN-X 11771 I-LINK 11735
> Icom IC-756PRO #02121  Kachina #91900556  IC-765 #02437
>
> All outgoing email virus-checked by Norton Anti-Virus 2002
>
>
> Paul wrote:
> >
> > .
> >  Think  how many critical security patches and downloads, every version
of
> > windows, which concludes that  messages on the web are increasingly
> > vulnerable to hackers  and are far from secure, because even with
security
> > patches, Microsoft keeps on issuing never ending security updates.
> > What if we use cw over the web ??.   To start with , only a handful of
> > people are willing to use morse, you either like it or hate it. Ok you
might
> > say a decoder will decode everything. But if the messages are in five
digit
> > code, which only humans can decode ??  This is only a  first impression.
>
> _______________________________________________
> CW mailing list
> CW@mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
>