[CVCC] CVCC ARRL 160

[Ed Hughes]

I readily admit to having high speed problems with these characters
I,S,H,V,U

I think, if I had any of these calls I would go phone
S5HSH, SV5SH, I5VUS

By the same token, I find the suffix of   ESE  easy to copy,
and it's easy to send, it kinda just rolls off the keyer-hi

I'm polishing up my ten mtr dipole !!

dit-dit
KG4W

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <K4OSO at aol.com>
To: <w4hz at verizon.net>; <hmmjr at comcast.net>; <n4dj at me.com>
Cc: <cvcc at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: [CVCC] CVCC ARRL 160


>I logged so many dupes at your place I became self conscious about it,
> although its quicker to log than to explain.  Besides, now the other 
> stations
> probably have one  each of W4SZ and W4HZ!!!
>
> Lots of guys have "H/S" issues.  It seems that when I'm  S&Ping about 1 
> out
> of every 5 Q's I have to correct "K4OHO" to  "K4OSO".  If the other 
> station
> doesn't indicate he made the correction, I  call again.  In most cases, he
> accepts it as a new Q.  It happens so  frequently that I look out for it
> now.  Problem is, when I'm running its  anybody's guess what the other 
> station
> is typing in his log.  I think  I might try slowing down the "S" when I'
> running...or change my call to  K4CQ. :-)
>
> 73, Milt -- In beautiful, but icy, Rockville, Va.
>
>
>
> In a message dated 12/9/2013 2:39:00 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> w4hz at verizon.net writes:
>
> Guess I  have to change my call.......
>
> Jonathan
>
> -----Original  Message-----
> From: cvcc-bounces at mailman.qth.net  [mailto:cvcc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] 
> On
> Behalf Of H. M. Motley,  Jr,
> Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2013 8:47 PM
> To: Don Johnson
> Cc:  CVCC
> Subject: Re: [CVCC] CVCC ARRL 160
>
> W4HZ dupe rate was  6.545%.  That H in the call caused problems.  I worked
> every one  that indicated DUPE. They probably logged us as W4SZ  before!
>
> Puck
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Don Johnson  <n4dj at me.com>
> To: Ed Hughes <kg4w at comcast.net>
> Cc: CVCC  <cvcc at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 19:02:43 -0000  (UTC)
> Subject: Re: [CVCC] CVCC ARRL 160
>
>
>
> According to my  figures Sejo had 3.8% dupe rate and I had 2.7%  Thats
> fairly
> close.  Maybe some of the same guys?   I had several guys call me soon
> after
> working me. I just worked them again. I know my dupe rate is higher  the
> more
> I run.
>
> What rate do you other guys  have?
>
> 73,
> Don
> N4DJ
>
>
>
> On Dec 8, 2013, at 1:54 PM, Ed  Hughes wrote:
>
>> WoW!!!! nice going Sejo, Why so many dupes call you  ?
>> Probably busted spots... KG4W
>>
>> ----- Original  Message ----- From: "_ N3UA" <n3ua at msn.com>
>> To: "Puck W4PM"  <hmmjr at comcast.net>; "CVCC" <cvcc at mailman.qth.net>
>> Sent:  Sunday, December 08, 2013 12:19 PM
>> Subject: Re: [CVCC] CVCC ARRL  160
>>
>>
>>> ARRL 160m
>>> N3UA  @  W4DR
>>> Q: 1311 with  50 dupes =>  1261
>>> M:  113
>>> Total: 341260
>>> 73
>>> Sejo ,  N3UA
>>>> Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 15:44:05 +0000
>>>>  From: hmmjr at comcast.net
>>>> To:  cvcc at mailman.qth.net
>>>> Subject: [CVCC] CVCC ARRL  160
>>>> So far I've received log summaries from:
>>>>  W4HZ (W4PM, K4OSO, W4HZ)
>>>> W4ML (W4MYA)- outstanding for no 160  antenna!
>>>> N4DJ
>>>> WD4LBR
>>>> I heard  and worked the following others:
>>>> KG4W
>>>>  K4OSO
>>>> WU4G
>>>> N3UA @ W4DR
>>>> That's  8 possible logs. Are there more?  Let me have your  totals.
>>>> Puck W4PM
>>>>  ______________________________________________________________
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> CVCC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cvcc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:CVCC at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>