[Collins] Collins research reports

[Jim Whartenby]

I think that this holding of developments close to the chest like you describe must have cost Collins priority in patents.  I think that the publisher has a year to patent but once published, the idea becomes common knowledge and prevents others from making a disclosure.
Jim

Too much agreement kills a chat.  E. Cleaver

-----Original Message-----
From: Francesco Ledda <frledda at att.net>
To: Jim Whartenby <old_radio at aol.com>
Cc: collins at mailman.qth.net
Sent: Fri, Apr 30, 2021 1:38 pm
Subject: Re: [Collins] Collins research reports

There were some very good quality working papers. These were company property and not to be shared outside the company, as they were were loaded of company IP. I have a few of them and are pretty awesome.  

Best, Francesco

Sent from my iPad

> On Apr 30, 2021, at 12:05, Jim Whartenby via Collins <collins at mailman.qth.net> wrote:
> 
> Bell Telephone had the Bell Telephone Technical Journal, RCA had the RCA Review, did Collins have a means to publish technical research?  I have seen Collins authors publish in IRE and IEEE pubs but have not noticed any in-house publications that were widely distributed.
> Jim
> 
> Too much agreement kills a chat.  E. Cleaver
> ______________________________________________________________
> Collins mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/collins
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Collins at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html