[Collins] 75A4 Roofing Filter ?
Adam Farson
farson at shaw.ca
Fri Jan 23 22:14:48 EST 2009
Hi Jerry,
Many thanks for your comments. The nicest tube mixer I ever encountered was
the 7360, which I used as a combined RX 1st mixer and TX balanced modulator
in a transceiver which I designed and built in 1964.
Modern up-converting receivers generally have a bank of switched half-octave
RF bandpass filters ahead of the 1st mixer. The better receivers switch
these filters with relays or MMIC switches rather than diodes, and often
incorporate a high-Q tuned preselector in the RF chain.
Cheers for now, 73,
Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ
-----Original Message-----
From: collins-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:collins-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dr. Gerald N. Johnson
Sent: 23-Jan-09 07:48
To: collins at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Collins] 75A4 Roofing Filter ?
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 23:49 -0800, Adam Farson wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> The architecture of the 75A-4 is such that a "roofing filter" in the
> modern sense is an invalid concept.
>
> The 1st mixer down-converts the RF signal to a 1.5 - 2.5 MHz variable
> 1st IF. The 1st LO is crystal-controlled; the bandswitch selects the
> appropriate crystal. The 2nd mixer (excited by a PTO tuning 1955 -
> 2955 kHz) down-converts the variable 1st IF to a fixed 455 kHz IF. The
> 2nd IF filter is a 455 kHz Collins mechanical filter; this is the
> selectivity filter, not a roofing filter.
>
> http://www.collinsmuseum.com/75a4.html
>
> I hope my explanation is reasonably accurate, and helpful (I am not a
> Collins owner, but would love to have an HF9500 in my shack!)
>
>
> Cheers for now, 73,
> Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ
>
>
That's all correct. What I was going to say when I got around to it.
With different frequencies the explanation also applies to all the 75A, 75S,
51J, 51S, and R390() receivers. The broadband exposed mixers are the weak
points in all these receivers, the multigrid tubes make noisy mixers and
have limited dynamic range. Though the RF bandpass filters that are often
tracked with the LO are not nearly as wide as DC to 30 MHz often seen in the
recent receiver designs that upconvert to a roofing filter at 45 MHz. The
tuned RF stage definitely helps keep out strong signals from other band. It
doesn't help keep out the KW station down the block in the same pile up.
It is possible, and there are numerous articles about, to work over the
mixers in these receivers to improve dynamic range. W0MLY (now SK) used to
sell a solid state mixer for the 75S receiver, though he and I disagreed on
which mixer was most critical. One published mod for the
'A4 replaced the first mixer with a 12AT7 long tail mixer circuit that was
lower noise, but also lower gain.
--
73, Jerry, K0CQ, Technical Advisor to the CRA All content copyright Dr.
Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer
More information about the Collins
mailing list