[Collins] R388 51j-3
Dennis Gibbs
[email protected]
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:38:19 -0500
Dan and the group,
This may be blasphemy on my part, but I prefer the 51J3/R-388 over the
51J4s. The 51J3/R-388s seem more sensitive, and the audio quality is indeed
better. I can't help but think it is related to the insertion loss of the
mechanical filters in the 51J4 - which is nothing more than a 51J3 with the
mechanical filter conversion kit installed. Am I nuts, or does anyone else
feel this way? I love a nice 51J3/R-388 for general SWL'ing.
Dennis
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of DAN COTSIRILOS
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 3:20 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Collins] R388 51j-3
I haven't had a 388 51j3 in a long time! The audio is fantastic. I know the
J4's are the coveted ones but they don't hold a candle to the crystal filter
audio. Its like hi-fi!! Dan
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed. To learn how
to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html ---