[Collins] Hammarlund and Collins Radio
Dr.Gerald Johnson
geraldj at ispwest.com
Sun Aug 15 11:03:36 EDT 2004
I don't think Art would have cooperated with anyone unless they had a
gun to his head (or some bank insisted on cooperation to make a loan).
The mechanical filters were sold to other radio makers as a Collins
product, like the toroidal coils, and complete radios. Using those
component products doesn't even hint at a cooperative relationship,
other than as vendor and buyer which could have been through a
distributor.
Many radios have RCA phono jacks on the back, for sure Heathkit (and
the SB line was designed by an Ex Collins engineer who had worked on
the S-line) and Tentec, to say nothing of virtually every AM/FM stereo
tuner. Some would criticize the use off RCA phono jacks on
communications equipment, though Collins did use a better quality jack
from Switchcraft than the ordinary home entertainment product.
Motorola did use RCA phono jacks for RF connections internally to two
way radios for a long time, again, not the cheapest parts and they
were adequately reliable. When making patch cables, the use of
Switchcraft plugs can result in a more reliable set of cables than using
phono plugs from the Pacific rim.
With the 32S1 control outputs being relay contacts, it could be
considered compatible with any receiver that had its own antenna
input and that was muted by opening a circuit. And that muting was
common in most receivers from the 30's on. Either by opening the B- or
the RF-gain control line. Neither would have been so effective
necessarily in a transistorized radio, but a suitable control circuit would
only take another transistor or two. Mating the VFO and crystal circuits
would have required the frequency conversion scheme be the same
and that wasn't typical of Hammarlund equipment before that time. I
don't know what frequencies the HQ-215 used.
For many years, my S-line was connected together through a patch
panel and under stormy conditions on 75m I used a Q-5er with converter
that handled static immensely better than the ringy mechanical filter in
the 75S-3B connected to the 32S-1 and they worked together just fine,
just wouldn't transceive with single knob frequency control.
73, Jerry, K0CQ, Technical Advisor to the CRA
--
Entire content copyright Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer.
Reproduction by permission only.
More information about the Collins
mailing list