[Boatanchors] RE HRO-60

[Jacques Fortin]

Howie, if you mean Pete Williams, I contacted him last week using the same address, and all was OK.
Maybe his service provider is down...
In Downunder, you never knows...

73, Jacques, VE2JFE

-----Message d'origine-----
De : boatanchors-bounces at mailman.qth.net <boatanchors-bounces at mailman.qth.net> De la part de Howie WA3MCK
Envoyé : 12 mai 2018 13:26
À : D C _Mac_ Macdonald <k2gkk at hotmail.com>
Cc : boatanchors at mailman.qth.net; jupete at internode.on.net
Objet : Re: [Boatanchors] RE HRO-60

Gang,
I tried to contact Pete
 - internode dot on dot net  -
directly concerning his question about an E box and his email bounces - I tried it several times - no joy...
Does anyone have a good email address for him?
Howie WA3MCK


On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 05:06 D C _Mac_ Macdonald <k2gkk at hotmail.com> wrote:

> It may not help, but the E coilset for an HRO-50 will work just fine.
> Possibly, the E coilset for an HRO-7 would also work.  SOME older 
> coilsets will also work, but there is a danger to either the coilset 
> contacts or the fingers in the radio if not done VERY carefully.  No 
> personal experience, but that is stated in several references.
>
> Let eBay watch for what you want.  Do a search for whatever you want, 
> then save the search.  eBay will email you whenever the item gets listed.
> That's how I got my AA, AB, AC, AD, E, F, G, H, and J coilsets.
>
> 73 de Mac, K2GKK/5
> (Since 30 Nov '53)
> Oklahoma City, OK
> USAF Retired 61-81
> FAA Retired 94-10
>
> ________________________________
> From: boatanchors-bounces at mailman.qth.net < 
> boatanchors-bounces at mailman.qth.net> on behalf of Pete Williams < 
> jupete at internode.on.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 00:12
> To: boatanchors at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: [Boatanchors] RE HRO-60
>
> ​G;morning   all
>
> Many  thanks  to those  who  responded  with  assistance on the   band
> change problem......  certainly  no  'O' ring in my  radio !.. In lieu of
> a    small 'O' ring  I'm proposing to  heat shrink  a   few  layers of
> tube over the  spot.
>
> I need  the  unobtainable 'E'  box... failing  that  has there ever 
> been any  attempt to  modify  a  lower  frequency box to  cover that  
> range.?  I realise  the  job appears formidable  and  time  consuming.  
> Coil  details would  be  the  most important  detail.
> Info  appreciated  as is the  assistance to  date..... in meantime I'll
> continue  with  rebuilding the    xtal  calibrator which   a previous
> owner modified to  use  only  the   100khz  xtal..  I  assume the  1.000mHz
> failed or  found  redundant   I have both available.
> Cheers
> Pete.
> ______________________________________________________________
> List Administrator: Gary Harmon, K5JWK
> ** For Assistance: gharmon at idworld.net **
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Boatanchors mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Boatanchors at mailman.qth.net
>
> List Administrator: Gary Harmon, K5JWK
> ** For Assistance: gharmon at idworld.net **
>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email 
> list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

--
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
______________________________________________________________
Boatanchors mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Boatanchors at mailman.qth.net

List Administrator: Gary Harmon, K5JWK
** For Assistance: gharmon at idworld.net **


This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html