[Boatanchors] My puddle waders, was Re: The ARRL's ...

John Franke jmfranke at cox.net
Fri Mar 2 12:13:53 EST 2018


> On March 2, 2018 at 12:07 PM John Franke <jmfranke at cox.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>     I still do boat anchors from time to time, but most are now either old Hewlett-Packard or military surplus instruments. The sources of parts; broken televisions, ARC-5's, etc., are not as plenty as when I was growing up and they are just too darn heavy. I do spend more time repurposing surplus commercial microwave junk; down converters, etc. The junk is a great source of exotic semiconductors and other parts. I remove the circuit boards, physically cut out sections, splice them together, and play and learn with the results. I call it a "cut-and-paste" approach to microwaves. From time to time I write articles on the projects to show newcomers how easy and inexpensive it is to do. I enjoy getting emails from the readers asking questions or sharing successes. Not all of it is directed to amateur radio. My interests in electronics and optics include non-amateur satellite signals, radar, precision time, navigation... 
> 
>     Still having fun and helping others, hams or not.
> 
> 
>     John Franke
> 
>     WA4WDL
> 
> 
>     March 2, 2018 at 10:40 AM K5MYJ <macklinbob at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>         > > 
> >         I got my Novice ticket in 1957. In those days ham radio was really a
> >         builders hobby for the average person. Even buying a Heathkit kit was a
> >         major expense.
> > 
> >         We used to build projects from the ARRL Handbook or QST. We could by QST at
> >         our local Radio/TV supply where we could also buy parts.
> > 
> >         We could take our time and buy the parts as we had money available.
> > 
> >         Mouser and DigiKey don't carry a lot of the parts needed for tube type
> >         projects. eBay now seems the best source and you have to grab them when they
> >         are available.
> > 
> >         I have a good collection of old (pre 1980) ARRL Handbooks and the QST
> >         collection on the computer. Sometimes it's just fun to read the old
> >         articles.
> > 
> >         But today there is not much radio building other than QRP stuff.
> > 
> >         Bob Macklin
> >         K5MYJ
> >         Seattle, Wa.
> >         "Real Radios Glow In The Dark"
> >         ----- Original Message -----
> >         From: "B Farrell" <bradk4rt at gmail.com>
> >         To: "Boatanchors" <Boatanchors at mailman.qth.net>
> >         Sent: Friday, March 02, 2018 6:57 AM
> >         Subject: Re: [Boatanchors] The ARRL's next move
> > 
> >             > > > 
> > >             Isn't there already a radio service like that, FERS or GERMS or some such?
> > > 
> > >             I can't think of one rulemaking petition the ARRL has put before the FCC
> > >             in
> > >             the past 25 years that benefited the Amateur Radio Service. The League
> > >             through the years has gone from one scheme to another, band refarming,
> > >             license restructuring, etc., in the desparate hope that the change will
> > >             swell the ranks of hams the League hopes will buy QST subscriptions and
> > >             merchandise. But has any of it really served Amateur Radio well? The
> > >             no-code Tech license did bring in a lot of new hams, but how many remained
> > >             active or renewed their license?
> > > 
> > >             I agree, elimination of the CW exam was brought on by a small group of
> > >             whiners, but the ARRL's rep quietly endorsed it at one of the IARU
> > >             conferences and then didn't ARRL have a stateside group submit the
> > >             petition
> > >             to the FCC?
> > > 
> > >             What is encouraging is that I'm aware of a number of newer hams who are
> > >             learning CW.
> > > 
> > >             73,
> > >             Brad K4RT
> > > 
> > >             On Friday, March 2, 2018, Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > >                 > > > > 
> > > >                 There really needs to be a separate radio service established for
> > > >                 people who just want a VHF rig, and repeater for emcomm stuff and 2
> > > >                 meter CB etc., so the current amateur radio service can focus on real
> > > >                 radio technology and other affairs that have been the traditional
> > > >                 basis for ham radio. And licenses for that service can involve
> > > >                 testing for CW and radio theory and so on. It won't happen for a
> > > >                 variety of reasons though, one being FCC doesn't want more burden,
> > > >                 only less.
> > > > 
> > > >                 CW test was eliminated by No Code International, a New Zealand group
> > > >                 of zealots who came out of nowhere and blind sided everyone with a
> > > >                 grass roots organizing of opposition that welled up in the IARU then
> > > >                 ITU, and suddenly there was no more international requirement for CW
> > > >                 testing, and FCC scrapped it. Before that happened, a tiny minority
> > > >                 of Americans sued FCC claiming the CW test discriminated against them
> > > >                 because they had a disability of some sort that prevented them from
> > > >                 passing the CW test. And before that happened the CW test had been
> > > >                 deskilled to where you only had to pass a multiple guess test about
> > > >                 what had been sent, instead of turning in a minute of solid copy.
> > > > 
> > > >                 So to bring back CW FCC would have to get around the ADA. Never going
> > > >                 to happen.
> > > > 
> > > >                 Rob
> > > >                 K5UJ
> > > > 
> > > >                 ______________________________________________________________
> > > >                 Boatanchors mailing list
> > > >                 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors
> > > >                 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > > >                 Post: mailto:Boatanchors at mailman.qth.net
> > > > 
> > > >                 List Administrator: Gary Harmon, K5JWK
> > > >                 ** For Assistance: gharmon at idworld.net **
> > > > 
> > > >                 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > > >                 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> > > > 
> > > >                 ______________________________________________________________
> > > >                 Boatanchors mailing list
> > > >                 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors
> > > >                 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > > >                 Post: mailto:Boatanchors at mailman.qth.net
> > > > 
> > > >             > > > 
> > >             List Administrator: Gary Harmon, K5JWK
> > >             ** For Assistance: gharmon at idworld.net **
> > > 
> > >             This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > >             Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> > > 
> > >         > > 
> >         ______________________________________________________________
> >         Boatanchors mailing list
> >         Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors
> >         Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> >         Post: mailto:Boatanchors at mailman.qth.net
> > 
> >         List Administrator: Gary Harmon, K5JWK
> >         ** For Assistance: gharmon at idworld.net **
> > 
> >         This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> >         Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> > 
> >     > 


 


More information about the Boatanchors mailing list