[Boatanchors] Crystal Set Progress
Al Klase
ark at ar88.net
Fri Apr 24 00:36:46 EDT 2015
Gene,
I see two problems with that approach. Perhaps the biggest is that if
the slider touches two adjacent turns, it results in a shorted turn in
the coil that causes a great amount of loss.
Even if you can avoid that problem with a carefully designed slider,
it's still difficult to design a high-performance receiver around a
simple untapped inductor.
The difference between a brain-dead design and a good one is quite
striking. You can get a feel for some of the issues and appropriate
circuit topologies here:
http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/xtalset102/xtalset102.htm
Sorry, you got me on one of my favorite subjects.
Al
Al Klase – N3FRQ
Jersey City, NJ
http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/
On 4/23/2015 9:52 PM, Gene wrote:
> Why not use a variable inductor instead of tapping?
>
> The one I built in the late 40's had a coil wound with magnet wire on
> an oatmeal box and a 'slider' cut from a tin can that ran on an arc
> over the length of the coil.
>
> It had a real cat whisker & xtal and a pair of cans (earphones to the
> newbees)
>
> Gene, WØQFC
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Boatanchors mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Boatanchors at mailman.qth.net
> Message delivered to ark at ar88.net
>
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
> ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **
>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Boatanchors
mailing list