[Boatanchors] Drake cable question

[Ron Bussiere via Boatanchors]

Thank you Glen...Going to do the test tomorrow........
 
ron
N4UE

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Glen Zook <gzook at yahoo.com>
To: bonddaleena <bonddaleena at aol.com>; rayfrijr <rayfrijr at msn.com>; 1oldlens1 <1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com>; boatanchors <boatanchors at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sat, Jun 7, 2014 7:16 pm
Subject: Re: [Boatanchors] Drake cable question



The recommended length for the Drake 4-Line cables is 30-inches long.  For the Heath SB-Line 24-inches long.  For the Collins S-Line 48-inches long.

 
Glen, K9STH



Website:  http://k9sth.com
 



 
 
 
  On Saturday, June 7, 2014 4:35 PM, Ron Bussiere via Boatanchors <boatanchors at mailman.qth.net> wrote:
  
  

 
Thanks to all who have responded. I'm gonna do a simple experiment....
I have several lab quality cap meters/bridges. One is traceable to NIST standards.
When I finally find my RG-62, I am going to measure the capacity of it and every other coaxial cable I can get my paws on.
I think a 3 foot sample will be OK.
Comments??

ron
N4UE

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: RAY FRIESS <rayfrijr at msn.com>
To: Richard Knoppow <1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com>; bonddaleena <bonddaleena at aol.com>; boatanchors <boatanchors at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Fri, Jun 6, 2014 8:02 pm
Subject: RE: [Boatanchors] Drake cable question



You are probably thinking of the Heathkit rigs.  Heath did recommend RG 62 for some of the connections between the sb 300 and 400.   



> Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 16:28:17 -0700
> From: 1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com
> To: bonddaleena at aol.com; boatanchors at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Boatanchors] Drake cable question
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: Ron Bussiere via Boatanchors <boatanchors at mailman.qth.net>
> >Sent: Jun 6, 2014 3:43 PM
> >To: boatanchors at mailman.qth.net
> >Subject: [Boatanchors] Drake cable question
> >
> >I finally found a 'rough' but complete T-4XB transmitter to go with my beloved R-4Bs.
> >I have a lot of Drakes and the CDs, etc.
> >
> >Just wondering about the cables to connect the xmitter and rec. I know that RG-62 is 'recommended', and I actually may have some, In fact, I'm sure I do.
> >However, just wondering why that 93 ohm cable was picked. Was it a matter of capacitance/foot, loss, resonance, what?
> >That was a LONG time ago, and I have lots of the new low-loss RG-6, RG-59, RG-58. For such a small length, I'm wondering how much difference it makes on HF....
> >
> >Just an old timer trying to learn.........
> >
> >ron
> >N4UE
> 
>     I double checked the handbook for both RX and TX and see nothing about recommended cable.  I use good quality hi-fi cables on my twins and they seem to work fine.  I have some memory that the injection cable should have relatively low capacitance but have not had any trouble the plain hi-fi hook up cables.  I am not sure if Garey Barrell, the maven from the Drake list monitors this list but if so I will defer to his opinion on this. 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Boatanchors mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Boatanchors at mailman.qth.net
> 
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
> ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **
> 
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

                           

______________________________________________________________
Boatanchors mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Boatanchors at mailman.qth.net

List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **


This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html