[Boatanchors] OT: CW Test
D C _Mac_ Macdonald
k2gkk at hotmail.com
Sun Dec 28 21:36:24 EST 2014
When I was first licensed in 1953, I think there were maybe 100,000 hams in the USA. I believe that's up to a million now.
* * * * * * * * * * *
* 73 - Mac, K2GKK/5 *
* (Since 30 Nov 53) *
* k2gkk hotmail com *
* Oklahoma City, OK *
* USAF & FAA (Ret.) *
* * * * * * * * * * *
> Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 20:28:38 -0600
> From: ranchorobbo at gmail.com
> To: nq5t at tx.rr.com
> CC: boatanchors at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Boatanchors] OT: CW Test
>
> I disagree. yes, there were lids, but there are more now.
>
>
> Rob
> K5UJ
>
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 8:26 PM, GRANT YOUNGMAN <nq5t at tx.rr.com> wrote:
> > Actually, while it may make us old geezers feel better that we had to struggle through cigar smoke filled exam rooms and suffer the trials of CW exams, I don't really think the CW test was an effective lid filter. If there hadn't been lids, Gil wouldn't have had a reason to draw cartoons :-)
> >
> > Grant NQ5T
> >
> >
> >> On Dec 28, 2014, at 6:13 PM, Dennis DuVall <duvallddennis at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> It was a great "Lid" filter.
> >>
> >> Dennis D. W7QHO
> >> Glendale, CA
> >>
> >>> On Dec 28, 2014, at 9:59 AM, David Stinson <arc5 at ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I'll only add that eliminating the CW test was a mistake, ...
> >>>
> >>> I put in my suggestion at the time to keep a 5WPM CW test
> >>> for just the Extra Class. I still think it was a good idea.
More information about the Boatanchors
mailing list