[Boatanchors] Carbon Mic Rejuvenation (& related)
Richard Knoppow
1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com
Sat Mar 16 16:37:49 EDT 2013
----- Original Message -----
From: "mac" <w7qho at aol.com>
To: "Bill Carns" <wcarns at austin.rr.com>;
<boatanchors at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Boatanchors] Carbon Mic Rejuvenation (&
related)
> Bill is correct about passive elements and power gain.
> Perhaps some of the confusion here centers around
> consideration of a carbon microphone as a "passive
> element." Standing alone it certainly is, just as a
> vacuum tube with no filament or B+ applied would be
> passive. Put the tube in a practical circuit though,
> i.e., power source and a load impedance and it becomes
> the "active " element we usually consider it to be. So,
> would a carbon mic augmented with a load impedance and
> bias (power) supply now (properly) be considered an
> "active" element? Different from a crystal or dynamic mic
> neither of which require a bias (power) source to
> operate. Academic question but interesting.....
>
> Dennis D. W7QHO
> Glendale, CA
>
Exactly the point I was trying to make except you said
it better:-)
--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
dickburk at ix.netcom.com
More information about the Boatanchors
mailing list