[Boatanchors] comment window open for RF Exposure proposed rule

[Paul Kraemer]

Many of the negative comments are probably from here, Fairfield IA, now home 
to the followers of the Maharishi (long deceased).
They descended upon us rational beings about 25 years ago, moving their cult 
from CA.
They have money and have been able to buy political power.
They recently strong-armed our city into removing all remote read water 
meters because of crap they are subscribing to---causes brain cancer 
etc---but you don't see them anywhere without their phone worn over their 
ear.
Please, add your common sense comments for whatever it may accomplish or we 
hams could find our selves permanently qrt from actions of stupid people
Paul K0UYA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo at gmail.com>
To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" 
<amradio at mailman.qth.net>; "Boat Anchors List" <boatanchors at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 5:55 AM
Subject: [Boatanchors] comment window open for RF Exposure proposed rule


> The FCC revision to the guidelines for RF exposure have now been
> published in the Federal Register:
>
> https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2013/06/04/2013-12713/reassessment-of-exposure-to-radiofrequency-electromagnetic-fields-limits-and-policies
> and
> https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2013/06/04/2013-12716/human-exposure-to-radiofrequency-electromagnetic-fields
>
> 360 comments have been filed, mostly from people who believe RF is
> killing life as we know it.
>
> Here is the schedule for comments:
>
> Comments must be filed on or before September 3, 2013, and reply
> comments must be filed on or before November 1, 2013.
>
> The dockets are: ET Docket No. 03-137, and Notice of Inquiry, ET
> Docket No. 13-84, FCC 13-39, adopted March 27, 2012 and released March
> 29, 2012.
>
> Go here: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment_search/
>
> and in the top box enter for example 03-137 for proceeding number.
>
> A review of the existing filed comments will show that most of them
> are from people who claim they get headaches from RF and "doctors" who
> agree. example:
>
> "Electromagnetic chaos within all technological creation causes
> malfunction on brain and human DNA
> and lower the use of it and added extreme protection will benefit 
> everybody."
>
> It's important hams file rational comments to balance the hysteria of
> some of the currently filed comments. There are 360 filed so far, most
> from people who seem to think RF is dangerous to all living things.
> There are also comments filed by something called the EMR Policy
> Institute.
>
> Rob
> K5UJ
> ______________________________________________________________
> Boatanchors mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Boatanchors at mailman.qth.net
>
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
> ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **
>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html