[Boatanchors] What! Re: Making a SX-110 Better?

[Carl]

It was not the bottom of Cycle 19 in 62, that took a few more years.

Carl
KM1H



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "RJ Mattson" <rjmattson at hvi.net>
To: <boatanchors at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:42 PM
Subject: [Boatanchors] What! Re: Making a SX-110 Better?


> The SX-110 was my novice receiver.
> It was the bottom of the sunspot cycle in 1962.
> Worked all states on 80/40/15m
> Got the KH6 on the dead 15m band plus KP4,KG4, PY4, LU6 etc.
> Guess I didn't know it was a bad used RX buy back then :-(
> Antenna: 80-10m 14AVS vertical.
> Regards,
> bob...w2ami x wn2ami 1962
>
> ----- Original Message ----- > On 3/10/2011 11:26 AM, Bob Macklin wrote:
>>> Is it possible to make a SX-110 a better receiver.  I can hear more on 
>>> my
>>> NC-109 than I can on my SX-110.
>>>
>>> Is it worth messing width?
>>>
>>> I am able to hear some SWBC on it but it sucks on the ham bands.
>>>
>>> I have not done any critical sensitivity measurements.
>>>
>>> Bob Macklin
>>> K5MYJ
>>> Seattle, Wa.
>>> "Real Radios Glow In The Dark"
>>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Boatanchors mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Boatanchors at mailman.qth.net
>
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
> ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **
>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html