[Boatanchors] Making a SX-110 Better?

[Carl]

So does a S-38


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob Macklin" <macklinbob at msn.com>
To: <anchor at ec.rr.com>
Cc: "Boatanchors list" <boatanchors at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Boatanchors] Making a SX-110 Better?


> The SX-110 sounds good on the AM BC band!
>
> Bob Macklin
> K5MYJ
> Seattle, Wa.
> "Real Radios Glow In The Dark"
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Al Parker" <anchor at ec.rr.com>
> To: "Bob Macklin" <macklinbob at msn.com>
> Cc: "Boatanchors list" <boatanchors at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 9:56 AM
> Subject: Re: [Boatanchors] Making a SX-110 Better?
>
>
>> It's just like they used to say, "if you want to hear it, use a National,
>> if you want to know where it is, use a Hallicrafters"  (if it's strong
>> enough).
>>
>> Al, W8UT
>> www.boatanchors.org
>> www.hammarlund.info
>>
>> "There is nothing -- absolutely nothing -- half so much
>> worth doing as simply messing about in boats"
>> Ratty, to Mole
>>
>> On 3/10/2011 11:26 AM, Bob Macklin wrote:
>>> Is it possible to make a SX-110 a better receiver.  I can hear more on 
>>> my
>>> NC-109 than I can on my SX-110.
>>>
>>> Is it worth messing width?
>>>
>>> I am able to hear some SWBC on it but it sucks on the ham bands.
>>>
>>> I have not done any critical sensitivity measurements.
>>>
>>> Bob Macklin
>>> K5MYJ
>>> Seattle, Wa.
>>> "Real Radios Glow In The Dark"
>>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Boatanchors mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Boatanchors at mailman.qth.net
>
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
> ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **
>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html