[Boatanchors] Mic's / RED FLAG
Richard Knoppow
1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com
Mon Jul 18 15:32:54 EDT 2011
----- Original Message -----
From: "Glen Zook" <gzook at yahoo.com>
To: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo at gmail.com>;
<telegrapher at q.com>; "Greg Mijal"
<bluebirdtele at embarqmail.com>
Cc: <boatanchors at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 11:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Boatanchors] Mic's / RED FLAG
The problems with the original D-104 cartridge are
They are very susceptible to humidity. That is, the salts
dissolve when exposed to humidity for a long time.
They are very susceptible to shock. That is, drop the
microphone, or hit it very hard, and the cartridge goes bad.
Finally, and this is the most important, Astatic no longer
makes a replacement cartridge!
Glen, K9STH
Website: http://k9sth.com
These are problems with all crystal devices,
microphones, headphones, phonograph pickups, and record
cutter heads. Also some other devices such as pressure and
vibration pickups. The Rochelle salt of which they are made
is very hygroscopic, i.e., they readily absorb moisture as
you state and turn into a sort of paste. The crystals can
fracture, either from external shock or, if the crystal is
driven from a voltage source, from being driven too hard.
This used to be a problem when crystal cutter heads were
common for home disc recording. Phonograph pickups could
also be fractured by dropping the needle or scraping it
across the record. The crystals are also sensitive to
temperature. The maximum safe temperature is about 115F and
at 135F the crystal is permanently damaged. Also, the
moisture absorption increases rapidly with temperature so
that if the seal of the crystal element is damaged the
element will be quickly destroyed by the cobination of high
temperature and high humidity. Also, the capacitance of the
crystal changes with temperature so that the effect of a
long cable becomes greater as the temperaure is increased.
Much of the technology of crystal elements has to do
with methods of sealing the element. Some methods were
obviously more successful than others but its hard to make
comparisons of old equipment unless the history is known.
One of the important developments in making crystal
elements practical was the invention of "bender" and
"twister" type elements. Both are made by combining two
crystals in such a way that the driving force either bends
or twists the two elements. The output is the result of the
differential voltage, because of the way the elements are
mechanically fastened and electrically connected the output
is much larger than it would be for a single element.
Ceramic elements are very similar to Rochelle salt ones
but are substantially less sensitive to moisture and
temperature. They are still sensitive to shock and
fracturing. The output is much lower than a Rochelle salt
element, perhaps 10db for a similar working element. Since
electronic amplification has developed to the point where
the very high output of a Rochelle salt element is seldom
necessary ceramic elements pretty much replaced them.
Crystal or ceramic microphones, pickups, etc., are
quite simple and cheap to produce in comparison to other
generating elements such as moving coil or magnetic types
but modern electrets are probably even cheaper and do not
have the drawbacks. They require an electronic impedance
matching circuit so do require a small amount of power. As a
result they are nor direct replacements for other types of
microphones (except carbon mics in some applications).
The use of Rochelle salt crystals for microphones,
etc., was first described by C. B. Sawyer in the Proceedings
of the IRE in 1931 and he also held the original patent. The
patent was licensed to the Brush Development Company who
both developed practical applications and licensed other
manuacturers such as Astatic and Shure. The Astatic D-104
was the first practical crystal microphone to be offered
commercially.
BTW, nearly all Brush crystal headphones are dead or
weak so they are likely to be only display items. They are
not repairable.
When working they are capable of quite high fidelity
and have virtually infinite input impedance (more than 100K)
so are useful for audio frequency bridges.
--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
dickburk at ix.netcom.com
More information about the Boatanchors
mailing list