[Boatanchors] Media Mail and the USPS boxes.

[Carl]

If the USPS wanted to actually do something intelligent then they should 
allow the free boxes to go by any method, simply affix the proper sticker. 
They would then attract more users away from UPS and FedWrex due to the 
convenience.

Also keep the postage competitive by laying off the non productive overhead 
that thinks up all the new rules and paperwork.

Carl
KM1H




----- Original Message ----- 
From: <sdaitch at kuw.ibb.gov>
To: <jfor at quik.com>
Cc: <boatanchors at mailman.qth.net>; "Kim Herron" <kim.herron at sbcglobal.net>
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 3:01 PM
Subject: [Boatanchors] Media Mail and the USPS boxes.


> If the only thing the USPS was collecting was the 20 cents for the
> cardboard box, maybe so.  And, yes, there are certain weight and zone
> categories where PP and Priority mail are very close in price.  In fact,
> at the low end of the weight chart, PP and Priority are only five cents
> apart.
>
> Years back, the PP and Priority rates for zone 8, under 17 pounds,
> considering the non-machinable charge, it was actually cheaper to
> use Priority rates than PP.
>
> I suspect in the typical mail sorting facility, more than one misused box
> is found every hour.  At some point, it might really cost more to have
> the postal inspectors involved than for the USPS to eat the cost of 
> misused
> boxes.  On the other hand, if there were no oversight, and I will grant, 
> the
> counter clerks should be screening this at the time of mail acceptance, 
> but
> apparently enough slip by, without the mail stream inspections, the abuse 
> of
> USPS boxes would go way up.  Perhaps the solution is to allow the boxes to
> be used and simply imbed those costs in the newer rates.
>
> The real concern, as I understood Kim's earlier response was the abuse of
> Media Mail for contents which don't remotely resemble authorized content 
> for
> the discount rate.  I do agree that the DMM should be revised to allow 
> printed
> content with advertising provided that advertising is at least XXX years 
> old.
>
> Even then,  I suspect there will be some folks who decide to skirt the 
> regs on
> how old the magazines are in a shipment, to save a few bucks on shipping.
>
> 73
> Sheldon
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "J. Forster" <jfor at quik.com>
> Date: Sunday, September 12, 2010 9:16 pm
> Subject: Re: [Boatanchors] Media Mail, trying again.
>
>> If you compare PP and Priority rates, in many cases the difference is
>> pennies, unless you are shipping boxes of bricks.
>>
>> To have a $25/hour Postal Inspector worrying about misuse of a
>> $0.20 box
>> is ludicrous.
>>
>> -John
>>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Boatanchors mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Boatanchors at mailman.qth.net
>
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
> ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **
>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html