[Boatanchors] Fw: Re: SI units and the rest

[rbethman]

Personally, I do not see any "useful" result in this "tiny" piece of the 
Wikipedia entirety.

The best that this could "possibly" do is continue a "thread" which is 
essentially a "dead horse".

My $0.02

Bob - N0DGN

On 11/18/2010 1:39 PM, mac wrote:
> I would like to second the motion.
>
> Dennis D. W7QHO
> Glendale, CA
>
> ******************
>
> On Nov 18, 2010, at 10:24 AM, sdaitch at kuw.ibb.gov wrote:
>
>> Playing a bit of devil's advocate here, and since
>> I don't know enough about the ARC-5 system to
>> dispute the Wikipedia page, I've got two questions.
>>
>> Would you detail what parts of the Wikipedia page
>> are incorrect?
>>
>> What input are you providing to Wikipedia to correct
>> the errors that you have noted?
>>
>> I am not asking these questions to pick a fight, but
>> if information in the Wikipedia page on the ARC-5 system
>> is wrong, let the forum know what you believe to be
>> incorrect.  That can be discussed and debated and then
>> the corrected information can be submitted back to
>> Wikipedia with comments and suggestions to improve
>> the entry.
>>
>> To me, that is a win-win all around.  The misinformation
>> is corrected and Wikipedia is improved.  To simply say
>> Wikipedia is incorrect is too broad a paint brush for
>> a large information database as Wikipedia.