[Boatanchors] [Milsurplus] Should this be surplus?

Clarke, Tom AIR4.0P NATOPS frederic.clarke at navy.mil
Mon Jul 26 17:38:26 EDT 2010


Imagine the shipping charge!

Imagine the electrical service/bill - that drive motor wants 600 volts at 5500 amps!

There are a couple of other ones out there - NASA Ames and Holloman AFB, maybe more.

Tom/W4OKW
-----Original Message-----
From: J. Forster [mailto:jfor at quik.com] 
Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 10:40 PM
To: Pete Lancashire
Cc: boatanchors at mailman.qth.net; boatanchors at theporch.com; radioman390 at cs.com; milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Boatanchors] [Milsurplus] Should this be surplus?

It's an interesting historical artifact but nowhere near as important as
the launch comlex where the Apollo vehicles launched. They were scrapped
years ago.

The instrumention and machine are historical artifacts and are way out of
date. It presents no current threat. It might make a fun carnival ride.

Most Apollo era stuff is not worth much unless it actually flew. Lots was
produced.

-John

=============


> Ethically .. no .. but when things like 90% of all data taken by NASA
> for Apollo were tossed in the dumpster
> this is nothing .. as a minimum all the paper should be scanned
>
> Just think .. one banking CEO's 35million bonus .. or how many minutes in
> ..
>
> sorry don't want to get pissed again this week
>
> -pete
>
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 6:54 PM,  <radioman390 at cs.com> wrote:
>> 400137964242
>>
>> EBay
>>


More information about the Boatanchors mailing list